CLL/SLL Roundtable: Updates on Patient Managem... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,532 members38,709 posts

CLL/SLL Roundtable: Updates on Patient Management (including low dose radiation treatment for early stage SLL)

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator
6 Replies

Joshua Brody, MD, Richard Bakst, MD, and Amir Steinberg, MD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, discuss updates on the management of patients with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The conversation includes discussion on radiation therapy for early-stage small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), testing for early-stage CLL, current management strategies, and future directions.

For those with early stage SLL, the first video is particularly interesting, as it discusses the successful use of low dose radiation for palliative management of SLL when the SLL is localised and there is no bone marrow involvement. Radiation treatment dosage is similar to that experienced on a transcontinental flight and can be repeated if needed, several years later. It can also be used very successfully to treat a swollen spleen with even less radiation. Professor Terry Hamblin, the highly regarded CLL researcher who discovered the importance on IgHV mutation status, considered radiation treatment potentially curable for early stage SLL, yet I rarely hear it mentioned.

The videos are 5 to 10 minutes in duration, but sadly with no transcript or means to change the video speed.

Video 1: Management of early-stage SLL

Video 2: Management of early-stage CLL

Video 3: Current management strategies for CLL

Video 4: Future directions in the management of CLL

mdedge.com/hematology-oncol...

In related news, Clinical Care Options have a program for specialists:- Optimizing Decision-Making in CLL in an Era of Novel Agents. Dr Anthony Mato, Associate Professor at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City discusses Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab and the Expanding Therapeutic Toolbox for Previously Untreated CLL.

Given the wealth of targeted therapies available for frontline CLL treatment, how does one select one drug vs another in the absence of head-to-head comparison data for each of these agents?

In my practice, I tend to administer ibrutinib as a monotherapy based on the data showing limited additive value of rituximab to ibrutinib. However, if I am being a purist, I would say that one could select the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab for patients who are similar to those in the ECOG 1912 trial: younger, fit patients with no previous therapy who are candidates for fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituxi

The second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib was recently approved in the frontline setting based on the phase III ELEVATE TN trial, which demonstrated a significant PFS benefit with acalabrutinib alone or in combination with the anti‑CD20 antibody obinutuzumab when compared with obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil. This is another regimen with the potential to use the BTK inhibitor alone or in combination with an anti‑CD20 antibody. A notable difference with ELEVATE TN is that this trial did show a benefit with the addition of obinutuzumab to acalabrutinib (albeit in a post hoc analysis that was not powered to detect statistical significance). However, in my practice, I generally give acalabrutinib as a monotherapy as well.

The major reason I have hesitated to incorporate anti‑CD20 antibodies in combination with BTK inhibitors in my practice is that the BTK inhibitors are given as continuous therapies regardless of the addition of an antibody. Although the anti-CD20 antibody likely deepens the response, we do not yet have data to determine whether or not we could shorten exposure to the BTK inhibitor in the setting of combination therapy.

The BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax is also approved for frontline CLL in combination with obinutuzumab, based on the phase III CLL‑14 trial. In that study, venetoclax plus obinutuzumab led to significant improvement in PFS and higher MRD negativity vs chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab. The major advantage of this combination is that it is a time‑limited 12‑month therapy where venetoclax is given for 12 months and obinutuzumab is given for a total of 6 months.

Selecting among regimens can be challenging, and one must consider the patients, including their age, fitness, past medical history, active comorbidities, and treatment preferences.

clinicaloptions.com/oncolog... (Registration limited to medical practitioners)

If you are US based and at all unsure of your specialist's treatment recommendation, you may be eligible for a free video consult with a CLL specialists through the CLL Society's Expert Access program. cllsociety.org/cll-society-...

"To participate in the Expert Access Program, you must reside in the United States and have a CLL diagnosis, without current access to a CLL expert. If you are unsure if you are already seeing a CLL expert physician, check our list of CLL expert doctors here."

cllsociety.org/toolbox/cll-...

This is an unlocked post: healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo...

Neil

Written by
AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeil
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
czbm profile image
czbm

Thank you for posting this link. I have SLL and sent the link to my specialist at Moffitt.

studebaker profile image
studebaker

Excellent post Neil. It made me think about someone showing only 1 or 2 bulky lymph nodes In one area would get the irradiation therapy on those would not progress to full blown SLL and possibly be cured ?

Dana

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator in reply to studebaker

Exactly Dana. If you can destroy the SLL cells before they spread more widely, then a cure is indeed possible.

Sushibruno profile image
Sushibruno in reply to AussieNeil

I wish it was the same for cll. Just shock it once and be done.

In 2011, I was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and SLL. I had my thyroid removed followed by radioactive iodine which is the practice of care after thyroid removal. My wife who is a doctor noted that the radiation had a profound positive impact on my SLL.

Peggy4 profile image
Peggy4

Very interesting videos. I listened to the one Dr saying how he recommended a bone marrow biopsy and IGHV status as part of Initial testing. That, along with flow cytometry etc.... would provide a base line for future reference. I can only speak for myself, but I would have liked a ‘base line’ even though I know that things can change.

Peggy

You may also like...

Mode of Progression After Frontline Treatment Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With CLL

FCR vs BR and obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil as compared to rituximab plus...

Chemo-Free Treatment Best Option for CLL Patients Under 70

phase III ECOG trial found that the combination of ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus rituximab (Rituxan)...

UK CLL Forum - updated post lockdown guidance for the management of CLL

of the COVID19 pandemic the UK CLL Forum issued guidance on managing CLL patients. This guidance...

An Early Look at When CAR-T Therapy Fails Patients With CLL

characteristics of patients with CLL who received anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy during a clinical trial...

Radiation as sll treatment

saw my cll specialist for the first time today and since I have sll (p17 del) in the early stages...