iADT for mCSPC?: Been on Lupron, Xgeva... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,285 members27,986 posts

iADT for mCSPC?

Wgly profile image
Wgly
28 Replies

Been on Lupron, Xgeva ADT + Abi +P for 2 years, PSA and T unmeasurable. for most of this time. Taking only 500 x 1 Zytiga daily w/o food (convinced ONC to continue test dose that worked) + 10 mg Prednisone that has lots of my suspect SE's associated.

SE's were few and manageable but last couple months a couple dozen of others intermittently raise their heads. Main ones fatigue, memory, weakness, solid sleep are becoming difficult, and getting me ground down. Would love a drug holiday break to help sort these out, mostly restarting exercise.

Has anyone with mCSPC received a holiday. Not much, if any, in literature, and that is negativish. Starting conditions, duration, ending condition and treatment would be good to know, what argument to get it worked and how you felt about it all. Want to ask Onc, but not much ammo around.

Written by
Wgly profile image
Wgly
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
28 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Here is the evidence I'm aware of:

prostatecancer.news/2023/04...

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toTall_Allen

iADT is confusing because literature addressing it is for cases that are no longer responding to ADT but have become Castrate or Hormone resistant. If I read it right, they therefore don't address mCSPC holidays

BTW I'm off Xgeva for a cycle because of a tooth infection and risk ONJ.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toWgly

I’m confused by your post. Are you asking about CRPC (castration resistant) or HSPC (hormone sensitive)?

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toTall_Allen

That's my problem. I've responded to ADT and been at its nadir for 18+ months so I'm apparently still mCSPC, but the SE's are really getting me down. Why shouldn't I get a holiday to get exercise, R & R? Even a month or two? Some older papers liked that, and it may be worth whatever the risk, you've explained as the same as not taking enough of an antibiotic. If it simply sets me back a few months, it should be worth it.

Schwah profile image
Schwah in reply toTall_Allen

Hi TA. I’ve read your blog re IADT vs CADT Very thorough. Great work!

One question. Has there been any study comparing the relative risks of IADT vs CADT since the doublet (and later the triplet) therapies became the standard of care? If all of these studies involve men who were only using ADT, then it seems like men who have engaged in doublet or triplet therapies are pretty much flying blind as to how IADT vs CADT may play out for them, no?

Schwah.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toSchwah

The questions one must answer are the same:

1. Is there any oncological advantage to iADT?

2. Is there any oncological disadvantage to iADT?

3. Is there any QOL advantage to iADT?

1. When one has previously done just ADT, what we've learned from these trials is that iADT makes no difference in time to castration-resistance (CR). We have to reject the hypothesis that resistance can be delayed by breaks in hormone therapy. Reducing the volume of cancer has a bigger effect than reducing the adaptive pressure periodically. Intensifying the cell kill rates with ARSi and/or chemo is known to have a bigger effect than ADT alone. What then is the oncological advantage in taking breaks?

2. IADT may lead to a 10% reduction in survival. Maybe the risk is less (between 0-10%) if the "on-therapy" cycles include an ARSi. Maybe the risk is greater than 10% because the cancer cells being given a break are even more resistant. Maybe it makes no difference.

3. I have seen no data on the effect of previous ARSi on Testosterone recovery. I would guess that it makes no difference because they don't affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis.

Schwah profile image
Schwah in reply toTall_Allen

“Maybe the risk is less (between 0-10%) if the "on-therapy" cycles include an ARSi. Maybe the risk is greater than 10% because the cancer cells being given a break are even more resistant. Maybe it makes no difference.”

You could even make the argument that there is a chance that the inclusion of ARSi in the “on therapy” cycles could result in longer survival times with IADT. That’s my point. With no study based upon the new SOC protocols, we are flying blind. I assume you know of no ongoing studies that compare IADT with CADT where ARSi is being used? I would guess that survival times have increased so much since adding ARSi, that such a study would take many years to determine any increase or decrease in survival times.

Schwah

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toSchwah

"You could even make the argument that there is a chance that the inclusion of ARSi in the “on therapy” cycles could result in longer survival times with IADT. "

That is exactly what I addressed in"1."

1. When one has previously done just ADT, what we've learned from these trials is that iADT makes no difference in time to castration-resistance (CR). We have to reject the hypothesis that resistance can be delayed by breaks in hormone therapy. Reducing the volume of cancer has a bigger effect than reducing the adaptive pressure periodically. Intensifying the cell kill rates with ARSi and/or chemo is known to have a bigger effect than ADT alone. What then is the oncological advantage in taking breaks?

Please re-read.

Schwah profile image
Schwah in reply toTall_Allen

Gotcha. Sorry and thanks

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toTall_Allen

It gives periods of relief and exposure to SE's. If that psychological break prevents stoppage of treatment it can result in oncological advantage

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toTall_Allen

I'm looking at this "Current Clinical Aspects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review for Urologists and Medical Providers - Jordan G Kassab, et al, 2024.

1. It does show the advantages which include a holiday from ADT effects some of which are annoying or serious and burdensome, or more.

2. It tabulates no great difference in iADT and ADT mortality.

3. Not mentioned in the paper, but seen elsewhere T recovery is a flip of the coin

There are gaps in knowledge that can be closed. Given it has been used successfully it shouldn't be shadows banned by no mention in a SOC. We've seen members here with successful holiday stories.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toWgly

ALL the relevant evidence is in the article I linked.

1. There are no advantages to a vacation if T is not recovered.

2. The difference in mortality is about 10%, favoring continuous. Each patient can decide for himself if it's worth the risk.

3. T recovery rates are shown in the article I linked. If no T recovery, what's the point?

It is up to each patient to decide for himself -there is no SOC either way.

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toTall_Allen

Obviously not the Drs who suffer the SEs or treat them

vintage42 profile image
vintage42

"... Taking only 500 x 1 Zytiga daily w/o food (convinced ONC to continue test dose that worked) + 10 mg Prednisone..."

That is unusual dosing. I would think that 500 mg Zytiga, which is half the normal 1000 mg dose, could be too low to be effective. And that 10 mg Prednisone, which is for those who are CR taking 1000 mg Zytiga, is unnecessarily high for you. If you are still CS, and taking so little Zytiga, why not change the Prednisone to 5 mg to reduce its side effects?

Concerned-wife profile image
Concerned-wife in reply tovintage42

Dose With food.

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toConcerned-wife

It works as is. I'm an outlier, as with food is needed in India where I understand reduced dose with food has been proven. Onc. wasn't happy, but if it hadn't dropped quickly and stayed down, I would have immediately increased the dose. I've been told by his PA the therapy has worked,

Hawk56 profile image
Hawk56

well, my story...

I have done it twice.

First time starting in May 2017 after completing triplet therapy.

Second time starting in April this year.

The first "holiday" lasted 4+ years the first time,

This time we are six months in, uncertain about the duration.

One of my objectives in coming off treatment was to minimize the risk of resistance. Another was feeling"better."

My medical team and I had decision criteria for coming off treatment. While off treatment we would actively monitor for clinical data showing activity, labs and consult every three months.

We also had decision criteria about going back on treatment, three or more consecutive increases,, PSA between .5-1.0, image, then decide on if, when, with what and for how long. My oncologist says likely 24 months Orgovyx and Xtandi and SBRT.. I said let's wait and see what's in play at that time based on the imaging and advances brought into play by medical research.

My clinical data says high risk - GS 8, GG 4, 18 months to BCR, PSADT and PSAV. With that kind of clinical data I have seen arguments that I should be on continuous treatment.

I have chosen not to for the reasons I listed. I guess no bone or organ involvement has played in mine and my medical team's decisions.

It my prostate cancer, not yours, so my decisions may not be yours but discuss with your medical team and decide.

If you do come off, definitely consider doing the labs and consult and develop your decision criteria about clinical data that triggers going back on.

In both cases I have recovered my T fairly quickly so that's a factor in the quality of my "holidays."

Kevin

Clinical History
Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toHawk56

It worked for (m?)HSPC. I'm working with mCSPC, which apparently hasn't been studied thoroughly for iADT, but is rejected, or discouraged, or might be allowed. Not clear because it looks like the decision was made on inconclusive studies. I suspect I'm wrong, but I would prefer not to wait until it progresses further.

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toHawk56

That's what I'm talking about.

Hawk56 profile image
Hawk56

did you mean to say MCRPC?

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toHawk56

No. Well I suppose it could be except PSA and T haven't risen. Or I'm cured

CANAMA profile image
CANAMA

I was Hormone Sensitive when following the orders of my MO at MSK, I stopped all treatments in June 2019. My PSA has remained undetectable up to my last blood draw on 9/17/24.

GoBucks profile image
GoBucks in reply toCANAMA

Excellent! I'm only 3 years behind. Great to hear.

Wgly profile image
Wgly

What reason did he give for stopping?

GoBucks profile image
GoBucks

I think 1 of the biggest decisions for you is quality of life. You are already 84, an age many here would sign up for in a minute. After 4.5 years of lupron & abiraterone I stopped all meds in June 2022. So far so good. Still <0.01. There is an ongoing clinical trial. Read about it here:

urotoday.com/conference-hig...

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toGoBucks

There is an arm here, Phase 2 of A-DREAM, I just found about and is closed. I don't think I qualified anyway.

Sent my request to Onc's office, not pressing for any option, if there is one. I don't expect to see him for about 2 weeks

GoBucks profile image
GoBucks in reply toWgly

Yes, it's closed but you can still participate off trial if you want.

Wgly profile image
Wgly in reply toGoBucks

I'll ask

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Starting on Xtandi

Hi guys, I've started on Xtandi, 4x40mg daily. Just wondering about SE's I might expect,and I'm...
deano58 profile image

BAT only for CRPC??

Is there any particular reason that BAT could not be used as first line Tx of rising PSA?? Sounds...
Tommyj2 profile image

Abiraterone after Docetaxel for mCSPC?

It's been a while since I posted. I am 68 years old, otherwise healthy and now 14 months...
john205 profile image

Sadly Pluvicto did not work ...

After receiving the results from my PSMA PET scan at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, I am sad to...

What to do next for treatment

I have prostate cancer which started over 3 years ago, I did chemo and lupron which seemed to work...
sjpoli46 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.