Both non-stop running - and run/walk for me!! - Couch to 5K

Couch to 5K

133,661 members159,162 posts

Both non-stop running - and run/walk for me!!

Bazza1234 profile image
Bazza1234Graduate
3 Replies

I am trying to figure out my way through a dilemma! I have launched myself into a 14 week HM programme , with the aim of running a HM using a run/walk strategy. This worked well for me last year when I trained for and completed a 14K run at an overall pace of 7;30 mins per K. I finished the run quite easily - and now think that if I can do the same over a distance of 21K, then I can say that I have made "improvement" . Distance first -- then worry about increasing pace- although 7:30 seems to be a nice comfortable pace for me over longer distances. I can get down to a smidge over 6:00 for a 5K ( average) - but at the end of that , I am just about throwing up - so that is not my aim for the end of a 21K run.

When I trained for the 14K run using a 2/1 run/walk ratio, I noticed that I seemed to slowly lose my ability to run 5K non-stop. It was a gradual thing - but I did slowly get the overall feeling that the two types of "running" were mutually incompatible. So now - I am adopting a personal policy -- from now on, I will run ALL distances up to 5K non-stop and all distances over 5K using run/walk. I have run 10K non-stop many times - both in a race and when training - but I do know that my "enjoyment" of running seems to diminish as I run non-stop over longer distances -- I do not like the "plodding" nature of it that I seem to fall into.

My dilemma is this -- and I think it will only be solved by experimentation -- what run/walk ratio will I use this time? I have noticed that Galloway is these days recommending the same ratios as per normal (ratios depending on pace) - but with shorter running periods. - So - as an example - for a pace of 7:30 per K ( 12 minute miles) he used to recommend 2/1minutes - but now recommends 60/30 seconds - same ratio but different run/walk times. In theory, one would expect this to slow you down a little - due to the increased number of starts and stops when transitioning between running and walking - but we know, that for slower runners, run/walk usually means faster paces than when running non-stop ( especially for longer distances)

Written by
Bazza1234 profile image
Bazza1234
Graduate
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
3 Replies
Pigivi profile image
Pigivi

Oh I share this dilemma! But I am going to try running most of the way for the 10k event next Saturday

During the past few weeks I've done a bit of different trials and I found that if I run for 1 k and then walk 30 sec- 1 minute I manage to keep a decent pace (about 8min/km) - today I run 10k most of the way (well, I have this habit of stopping when I meet someone I know and have a wee chat...) at the formidable pace of 7:42! But for my next HM I'll go back to run/walk... Keep posting on how you're doing experimenting with different intervals!

Bazza1234 profile image
Bazza1234Graduate in reply to Pigivi

I have found this Facebook Galloway page - for UK runners mostly facebook.com/groups/3106910...

I can't help you on that one sorry Bazza.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

My first 10K non-stop ever!!!

-- and I am thinking that it may be my last. I managed to run non-stop for just over 10K this...

OOH!! 16K - that hurt!!!

Using a Jeff Galloway run/walk plan to enter ( and finish!) my first HM - my last two longruns of...

My first non-stop 6K

Although I have run up to 15Klms using run/walk, I have never exceeded 5Klms non-stop. So today, in...

Big week for me this week!!!

From my Runkeeper log Tue - 8klm easy non-stop (running club) Thu - 19 klm run/walk (HM......

My 10 week run/walk HM plan

I have settled upon a run/walk plan for the Sunshine Coast HM on 30 August...