Novel Combos Are Shaking Up the CLL Landscape ... - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,323 members40,025 posts

Novel Combos Are Shaking Up the CLL Landscape but FCR still has its place

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
12 Replies

Published: Saturday, Sep 14, 2019

During a presentation at the 2019 Society of Haematological Oncology Annual Meeting, Dr Jain said recent clinical trial findings have helped clarify therapy choices based on the patient’s age, comorbid conditions, and mutation status but that questions about optimal regimens and the duration of therapy remain unanswered.

In analyzing which patients derived the most benefit from the former standard of care, Jain said data from prior studies showed frontline FCR therapy resulted in favorable long-term progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with IGHV mutations who had achieved undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD).

They designed a phase II study testing the combination of ibrutinib, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and obinutuzumab (iFCG) for the frontline treatment of patients with CLL with mutated IGHV and without TP53 aberrations. Investigators included obinutuzumab because previous results showed that the drug induced higher rates of MRD negativity than rituximab. Patients received 3 cycles of iFCG followed by ibrutinib for 9 cycles and obinutuzumab for either 3 or 9 cycles, depending upon response and MRD levels. After 12 cycles, ibrutinib therapy stopped for those with undetectable bone marrow and continued for those with detectable MRD. The study enrolled 45 patients with a median age of 60 years (range, 25-71) with CLL categorized on the Rai stage as 0 (n = 1), I or II (n = 22), and III to IV (n = 22).

In findings presented at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting and updated in August 2019, investigators found that response improved over time. At 3 months, 39% of patients had complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 89% were MRD-negative. At 12 months, CR/CRi was 73% and MRD negativity was 100%.

More here: onclive.com/conference-cove...

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
12 Replies
avzuclav profile image
avzuclav

I find your addition ("but FCR still has its place") to the post title a bit misleading based on the referenced article. :) I think the point of the article is to show that adding novel agents with a reduction in chemoimmunotherapy (3 cycles instead of 6) seems to drastically improve results. Of course I'm jumping to conclusions, but 45 patients with 100% achieving MRD- at 12 months is unparalleled.

"Jain said those findings were superior to results from other trials evaluating 6 cycles of FCR, ibrutinib plus FCR, or FC plus obinutuzumab, for patients with IGHV-mutated disease."

What place would FCR have if iFCG was available?

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply toavzuclav

Yes, I did mean in combination but agree I may have misled people with the title

Jackie

avzuclav profile image
avzuclav in reply toJm954

Here's an updated comparison for mutated CLL:

twitter.com/PallawiTorkaMD/...

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply toavzuclav

Impressive numbers for UMRD4! :)

Jackie

GMa27 profile image
GMa27

So grateful to my FCR!

AdrianUK profile image
AdrianUK

Thanks for sharing Jackie. More evidence that combination treatment is probably the future way forward. 100% MRD undetectable is a pretty good result!

I’m personally more and more convinced that trying to achieve disease annihilation (that sub group of MRDU who will never again relapse ) is surely a good strategy especially early in disease.

I would love to see a study or say adding both venetoclax and obinituzimab to those patients currently showing good response to Ibrutinib to see if they too could get to MRDU. Interesting to see here how the use of I with drugs thaf work very differently to it has worked so well.

I also wonder what the disease would look like in someone who eventually did relapse from one of these super combinations. It would seem logical that the disease might be less likely to have become resistant as any clone that was resistant to one of the treatment should in theory have been killed by the other.

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply toAdrianUK

I agree Adrian about adding V to those who have had a good response to Ibruitinb. Could save money in the long run too :)

Re relapse - I wouldn't like to guess. All your chips rolled on that first throw of the dice.

Jackie

AdrianUK profile image
AdrianUK in reply toJm954

None of us know really what the best long term option is for us. On the one hand we could try a series of drugs one after the other moving from one to the next if and when the CLL becomes resistant to each drug. The alternative would be to hit it with a combo up front for a relatively short period with the goal of eradication and the hope that the CLL wouldn’t have had a chance to get resistant to the combo and it would work again. Even if there isn’t a cumulative effect of several drugs stopping resistance to each other lets take ibrutinib alone if you were destined to get resistant to it after say five years of continuous use perhaps we can split that five years into five separate single years (or even less) in combo with something else to get to MRDU.

With antibiotics we generally don’t like giving them to people continuously

Unless we can avoid it because of this issue of genetic mutation in his case of the bacteria.

Anyway nobody really knows of course which is why trials which compare different strategies in the very long term is going to be crucial for us.

Wroxham profile image
Wroxham

Thanks Jackie

Sue

GrapeGrower1 profile image
GrapeGrower1

I'm unmutated, lymph nodes getting bigger and still loosing weight so I think I'm three months from treatment. So my question is, where are we in approval process of obinutuzumab plus veneticlax. I read impressive stats on this combo and would like to get back to full productivity ASAP. (which I still am right now). Anyway will I have to find a trial or is this pretty close to approval for treatment naive.

Mldeterm profile image
Mldeterm in reply toGrapeGrower1

It is fully approved for treatment naive in the US.

GrapeGrower1 profile image
GrapeGrower1 in reply toMldeterm

Great to know, thanks

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Use of MRD Status Following Obinutuzumab/Ibrutinib to Guide Subsequent Intensification of Therapy in CLL

August 6, 2019 In this 2-part, single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial (Clinical Trials.gov...
Jm954 profile image
Administrator

Adding Venetoclax to Obinutuzumab Prolongs Progression-Free Survival in Previously Untreated CLL

Dated 1st September 2019 In a phase III trial of patients with previously untreated CLL...
Jm954 profile image
Administrator

Acalabrutinib Plus Venetoclax and Obinutuzumab Achieves High Bone Marrow uMRD Rate in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia - CLL

Great news from this long awaited first published phase 2 study reporting the efficacy of this AVO...
AussieNeil profile image
Partner

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Therapy Guided by Measurable Residual Disease

From the New England Journal of Medicine 10th December 2023 "The CLL treatment landscape has...
Jm954 profile image
Administrator

Younger, Fit Patients With CLL: Goal Remains Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease and Time-Limited Therapy

This article looks at the interim analysis of E1912, a U.S. randomized phase III trial comparing...
Jm954 profile image
Administrator