Efficacy of venetoclax monotherapy in patients... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,532 members38,709 posts

Efficacy of venetoclax monotherapy in patients with relapsed CLL in the post‐BCR inhibitor setting: a UK wide analysis

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
2 Replies

Feb 2019

Venetoclax is a BCL2 inhibitor with activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We conducted a multi‐centre retrospective analysis of 105 R/R CLL patients who received venetoclax pre‐National Health Service commissioning.

The median age was 67 years and median prior lines was 3 (range: 1–15). 48% had TP53 disruption. At ≥2 lines, 60% received a Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and no prior phosphoinositide 3‐kinase inhibitor (Pi3Ki), 25% received a Pi3Ki and no prior BTKi, and 10% received both.

Patients discontinued B cell receptor inhibitor (BCRi) because of toxicity in 44% and progression in 54%.

Tumour lysis syndrome risk was low, intermediate or high in 27%, 25%, and 48% respectively.

Overall response was 88% (30% complete response [CR]). The overall response rate was 85% (CR 23%) in BTKi‐exposed patients, 92% (CR 38%) in Pi3Ki‐exposed patients and 80% (CR 20%) in both (P = 0·59).

With a median follow‐up of 15·6 months, 1‐year progression‐free survival was 65·0% and 1‐year overall survival was 75·1%. Dose reduction or temporary interruption did not result in an inferior progression‐free or discontinuation‐free survival.

Risk of progression or death after stopping a prior BCRi for progression was double compared to those stopping for other reasons (predominantly toxicity) (Hazard Ratio 2·01 P = 0·05).

Venetoclax is active and well tolerated in R/R CLL post ≥1 BCRi. Reason(s) for stopping BCRi influences venetoclax outcomes.

Ref here (but no additional information): onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi...

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
2 Replies
GrapeGrower1 profile image
GrapeGrower1

If overall survival was 75.0, these patients must have been in last resort status?

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to GrapeGrower1

Yes, probably for the people who progressed on a BCRi.

Quote: Risk of progression or death after stopping a prior BCRi for progression was double compared to those stopping for other reasons (predominantly toxicity) (Hazard Ratio 2·01 P = 0·05)

Jackie

You may also like...

Good News! BTK inhibitor therapy is effective in patients with CLL resistant to venetoclax

note: BTK inhibitor therapy achieves durable disease control for patients with CLL after...

Treatment-naive or relapsed CLL patients will soon have zanubrutinib/Brukinsa as a treatment option in the EU

(NCT03336333), in patients with previously untreated CLL, and ALPINE (NCT03734016), in patients...

Duvelisib Dosing Modification Does Not Compromise Efficacy in Heavily Pretreated CLL/SLL

lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Furthermore, treatment with the PI3K inhibitor led to a superior median...

Adding Venetoclax to Obinutuzumab Prolongs Progression-Free Survival in Previously Untreated CLL

/adding-venetoclax-obinutuzumab-prolongs-progression-free-survival-previously-untreated-cll/ Jackie

An Early Look at When CAR-T Therapy Fails Patients With CLL

a high success rate — 82% of patients with CLL had an overall response with the anti-CD19 CAR-T...