Good News! BTK inhibitor therapy is effective... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,762 members39,057 posts

Good News! BTK inhibitor therapy is effective in patients with CLL resistant to venetoclax

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
5 Replies

3rd April 2020 Blood

Key points to note:

BTK inhibitor therapy achieves durable disease control for patients with CLL after progression on venetoclax.

Prior remission duration ≥24 months and deep response on venetoclax are associated with longer PFS on subsequent BTKi therapy.

Prior remission duration ≥24 months and attainment of complete remission or undetectable measurable residual disease on venetoclax were associated with longer PFS after BTKi salvage.

More here: ashpublications.org/blood/a...

Stay home, stay safe

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
5 Replies
cartwheels profile image
cartwheels

I think i read that btk inhibitors like ibrutinib can offen revive patients who are becoming resistant to veneticlax somehow stimulating the drug

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to cartwheels

Mmmmm, if so, that would be good. Have you got a reference?

cartwheels profile image
cartwheels in reply to Jm954

I'm sure I read it on here or on the cll society run by Dr Hoffman

ChrisLovesLife profile image
ChrisLovesLife

I've often wondered what could happen next since I'm down to 100 mg of Venetoclax daily due to tolerance/side effect issues after 14 months. I appreciate the information! Be well!

AdrianUK profile image
AdrianUK

Thanks for sharing this which I didn't notice a month ago so maybe others will also see. Brian K recorded an interview about this piece of work when it was presented. Here is the video and it is encouraging that even in really heavily pre-treated patients (i.e. people who historically had loads of rounds of treatment with chemotherapy before the modern drugs were available) they were still able to be treated with venetoclax and even after that more than half showed a response to ibrutinib.

The question remains open which way round is going to be best and this video honestly addresses that. We simply do not know which will give an over all longer time before we need another medicine: taking Ibrutinib for a few years then going onto venetoclax or taking venetoclax first before then going onto ibrutinib only when repeated bursts of a year or two of Venetoclax combination no longer get a deep remission.

One option is to see venetoclax a bit like a modern variant of FCR in terms of its goal of treatment. I.e. there surely has to be a chance that some folks who take venetoclax in combination early in the disease and get to MRD undetectable are going to turn out to have such long remissions they are effectively cured. Certainly some patients with FCR experience just that. Anyway the video is only 4 minutes so it might well be of interest for others to watch: youtube.com/watch?v=UcVbcAX...

You may also like...

Second-Generation BTK Inhibitors Hit the Treatment Bullseye With Fewer Off-Target Effects

therefore allow patients to stay on them longer, increasing their efficacy. Zanubrutinib is...

New drug: MS-553 inhibitor for CLL/SLL who develop resistance to BTK inhibitors

kinase C-beta (PKCß) inhibitor designed to be an alternative treatment option for patients with...

Resistance-Associated Mutations in CLL Patients Treated With Novel Agents

gene were detected in patients who had failed on venetoclax. For 20% of patients, the ibrutinib...

An Early Look at When CAR-T Therapy Fails Patients With CLL

happens in the patients for whom CAR-T therapy does not work,” “Anecdotally, we say that patients...

Looking for alternatives with BTK C481 resistant CLL

Looking for alternatives. I have had 3 prior treatments from FCR to other chemo to Veneclax and...