I love this group and enjoy contributing to it. Yeah, I've been a bit of a one-trick pony, as anyone who's seen my posts can attest to.
I keep harping on the necessity for utilizing either my own ED device the Loop, or especially now, the new dynamic duo, FDA-tested Giddy and Xialla, for effectively treating ED in most cases.
I call them that because whatever the reason, planned or unplanned, Giddy and Xialla go together like Laurel and Hardy, like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, like Aragorn and Arwen. Or, just like peas and carrots.
So WHAT don't I understand, in all seriousness?
I have been reading the many unfortunate, heart-rending outcomes from RP. These are guys who do not recover enough erectile function and/or enough sensitivity, and who Jessqrepresent the solid majority of men who undergo surgery. With these kind of results, it's no wonder that libidos take a beating.
Which leads me to ask, bluntly, Why in hell would any man choose surgery over radiation?? Yes, there are surgeons who have done thousands of these operations. And your odds improve somewhat with them. But until any surgeon opens up the area, the amount of nerve-sparing achievable is essentially unknown.
So, with all the advances like robotic-assisted surgery, still the aggregate percentage of potency preservation with RP is a whopping 37%. This is not a very encouraging percentage.
SURGERY --
Look at what you have to put up with in RP to "get that cancer outta there":
1). Immediate incontinence, usually weeks to months to recover from, with Kegels and so forth. The urethra has to be cut and reattached, shortening your penis by, in some cases, up to 2+ inches. Yike.
For someone who's 8" that's not so much of a problem, but for a man with 6", that could be a big, depressing deal to have to face life with that much of a shorter penis -- that may or may not recover erectile function.
2) Immediate ED, which needs serious penile rehab assistance expertise to recover. Even the best nerve-sparing surgery still renders the nerves inoperative for a time. They go into sleep-shock.
So you now have to deal with, I most cases, a number of months before whatever nerves are left wake up and enable substantial erectile function to return...if it does at all.
3) As is well-known, anyone who gets the surgery also has a substantial chance -- 30+% -- of needing salvage radiation anyway at some point. And ADT, which I've written about extensively, is a good possibility also. That's a beast unto itself.
It's dismaying that up to 80% of men who go through hormone therapy fail to keep their erections going during ADT. With predictable results post-treatment -- loss of libido, penile tissue damage and shrinkage, and permanent ED.
RADIATION -- especially the newer SBRT and TULSA Pro -- doesn't disturb the nerve bundles. Depending on the type, today's radiation delivery systems effectively target the cancer while limiting the damage to nearby organs.
There are late-onset ED problems that can show up for 50% of men receiving that treatment in the first two yrs after RT. So that's a risk. It's been a year since my RT was completed. So far, abd using the Loop to preserve erectile functioning during 18 months of ADT, things are looking good. I did not have to deal with incontinence or immediate ED from the primary procedure.
A huge relief!
The downside of radiation treatment is that there fewer salvage options. But they are there. Salvage surgery would be non-nerve-sparing, so that would be a terrible outcome.
Anyone considering RP had better look again!
Unless for medical reasons RP is unavoidable, PLEASE think about switching your plans to radiation! Penile rehab, armed with the fabulous new FDA devices and/or the Loop, can handle that in most cases.
OK, men! I've spoken my peace on this issue. Thanks for the support you've shown me on my PC journey forward.