Mixed results with AMH - IVF with PGS... - Fertility Network UK

Fertility Network UK

56,132 members59,612 posts

Mixed results with AMH - IVF with PGS starting soon!

jade1003 profile image
11 Replies

Hi,

We are nearly ready to start our first cycle of IVF. I have had 2 AMH blood tests done in the last 2 months with 2 very different readings. The first was 11 in November 2017 and then in January this year the clinic got a result of 5.5! How is this possible to drop by half in two months when all previous bloods have been OK levels. We now have to have our embryos PGS screened to check the chromosomes which means my embryos that read day 5 blastocyst stage will be frozen whilst we await results. Has anyone else had this happen, as this is all new information to us.

Becoming more worried and confused as the journey goes on......

Written by
jade1003 profile image
jade1003
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
11 Replies
Vicky35 profile image
Vicky35

Hi Jade 1003,

This can happen but it’s always a shock. My AMH was low to start with (I only have 1 ovary) and it halved in 3 months. I cried for days and panicked about the cycle. The clinic did not seem as worried though. I had a long protocol IVF with high doses of stims and ended up with 8 eggs and 4 blastocysts! Please try not to let it worry you too much. It only takes one! X

ClarabGlasgow profile image
ClarabGlasgow in reply toVicky35

Thanks for sharing! I had short pc with low amh & clinic suggested they’d try long if we go again so good to hear you had this response . Good luck for you too jade! xx

jade1003 profile image
jade1003 in reply toVicky35

Thank you for your reply. I did the same a cried for days. Clinic said they are not too concerned either! x

Cyantist profile image
Cyantist

I had my AMH measured by the hospital in the November, it was 4.7.

I had it redone at the clinic that was treating me 6 months later, it was 10.7.

Apparently (consultant at my clinic told me) it is so variable it can double or halve for no apparent reason, even from one day to the next. I guess they should do it several times and take an average to get a truer value but they're not really going to bother doing that.

It's ridiculous really when some people are turned down for treatment on the basis of this arbitrary number. In some areas I wouldn't have got funding based on my original test result of 4.7. Yet ICSI worked first time for me and I now have a wonderful little daughter.

Don't worry. Even 5.5 is not a bad result, and I bet the true result would be higher than that.

Also I'm not sure of anyone who has had blastocysts frozen while awaiting PGS results, but plenty of people have them frozen because of other reasons. Sometimes it can give your body more time to recover after the egg collection.

jade1003 profile image
jade1003 in reply toCyantist

Hi

Thank you for all of this advice and info. That's mad how it can change from day to day. All of my previous results were a lot higher although this test was done using a lancet and a small test tube done at home so maybe not the most accurate. That's lovely news that it worked first time for you and you have a beautiful little girl.

Thank you again x

We are having pgd which is due to my husband’s chromosome translocation. It’s similar to pgs in that they screen the embryos and have to freeze them whilst we wait for the results.

Why are you having pgs?

jade1003 profile image
jade1003 in reply toLizzielizzielizzie

The consultant said because my AMH is so low, although i am not sure if this is really needed? x

Lizzielizzielizzie profile image
Lizzielizzielizzie in reply tojade1003

Hope you don’t mind me saying but I would look further into this if I were you. The hfea have a write up about it on their site, basically it’s not a solution for low Amh and might lead to fewer live births. It makes the clinics more money though.

Lizzielizzielizzie profile image
Lizzielizzielizzie in reply toLizzielizzielizzie

hfea.gov.uk/treatments/expl...

Cyantist profile image
Cyantist in reply toLizzielizzielizzie

I agree with Lizzie - I can't see any reason for having pgs for low amh. It isn't even that low!

Screening for a genetic condition makes sense but it sounds like they are recommending things for the sake of it

Nobabyyet profile image
Nobabyyet in reply tojade1003

I am waiting to have first round of IVF. My AMH is 1.7 and never suggested having PGS. Are they charging for it? If its free i guess its a good thing. I've heard giving your body/uterus the chance to rest after all those hormones gives it a better chance. On other hand my dic says my low amh means he would be hesitant to freeze as he diesnt expect me to have many eggs to begin with and if they dont survive to day 5 for freezing then they're wasted.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

My PGS test results are back! OMG 😮 🙊 UPDATE- 4 transferable 😳😁

Hi beautiful ladies, As title says my results are back - nail baiting 🙉. We had 5 beautiful...
Ranchu90 profile image

Anyone over 40, no PGS with multiple miscarriages?

I'm just wondering how sensible we are being. I am 41 and have had 3 miscarriages so far and one...
Violet180 profile image

Ivf 3 starting now! Natural Modified IVF for low AMH

Hi everyone, We are finally starting ivf3 for the 4th attempt at it (2 pregnancies in the months...
Orla9298 profile image

Jumped in to IVF too soon??

Wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience to me? Got fast tracked to Ivf icsi because OH...

IVF vs trying naturally with low AMH

Just had second round of IVF with a failed fresh blastocyst transfer and a first round with no...
Greenfig123 profile image

Moderation team

See all
Claire_FNUK profile image
Claire_FNUKAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.