Just had second round of IVF with a failed fresh blastocyst transfer and a first round with no blastocysts (I am 43 with an AMH of 0.8).
When I had my initial consultation, I’m pretty sure that the consultant told us that our chances if trying naturally were at around 5%. He said (I think) that our chances with IVF were around 20%. I knew that was still low but my plan was to do as many cycles as we could over the next year until hopefully we were successful.
The first round was short protocol, which produced 4 eggs, 2 fertilised and 0 blastocyst. The consultant I spoke to afterwards was surprisingly positive, saying apparently it was a ‘good’ cycle and that he would change meds for next time.
The second round was long protocol, which was more successful with 5 eggs, all fertilised, 1 blastocyst. I got feedback from the embryologist, who was quite negative about the early fragmentation of my embryos, which she said never leads to high conversion.
I also had a consultation with a different doctor, who said even though my 1 blastocyst was good quality, the fact that it didn’t implant wasn’t surprising at all, given that 90% will be genetically abnormal:(. She said my chances with my own eggs will be 2-5% with ivf. She mentioned freezing and genetic testing for next cycles but also donor eggs.
I feel I’ve put too much into this to give up so quickly. But also questioning why I was recommended to start IVF at all (rather than just continue to try naturally) and I’m feeling dispirited... Apparently with my AMH they would have expected 1 egg, so my cycles haven’t even been so bad..
I’m thinking of arranging consultations with some of the more experimental clinics, for the best shot with my own eggs. Just wondered if anyone had any insights into chances at my age, as I have been told different things!