Hi, first post and a bit late to this but am after some advice... I am an overweight non-runner (or was a non-runner pre C25k) and although I had cycled and swum a bit in the past - I had been inactive for a few years... so I am pretty slow pace-wise. Honestly do feel proud to have got this far (just did week 8 run 1) I am a serial excuser and yet I haven’t missed or delayed a single session so am very pleased in that respect BUT (and it’s a but(t) even bigger than my own as it wobbles down the road on my runs!) I am not covering much ground on my runs and I am not sure how to get to the elusive 5k after week 9...
I have been tracking my runs but have included warm up walks until the last two runs where I turned the tracked on only for the running sections and I covered only 2miles in 25 mins 😫 and then 2.2 in my first 28min run tonight (pushed a little harder after the disappointment of only 2 miles!) . I admit I was very nervous of pushing too hard for fear of having to stop and not achieving the non-stop running goals... And I felt good this evening despite a little increase in pace so feel more confident about this now..
But at this rate I will not be running the elusive 3.107 miles by the end of week 9...I’ve done the maths and we’re looking at 36 mins for that (ish!) So my question is... after I graduate, should I A) keep increasing the TIME and aim to cover 5K in as long as it takes whilst still pushing myself gently then aim to decrease the time OR B) increase my PACE and aim to cover move distance in 30 mins over the following weeks? Which approach is better? Or is it just a matter of which suits different people?
Thank in advance to anyone with the patience to have read this far into my waffle!
P.S. I have a 5k fun run booked in early July and I am determined to run it all.