I'm 71 years old and retired, just completing 4 years of watch and wait, asymptomatic except for slowly declining Hgb and unstable platelet count. My FISH test was negative for trisomy 12, D13S319, p53 and ATM. My hemoglobin suddenly dropped from 9.2 to 7.8 over a six week period, and my hematologist is treating me with erythropoietin. She says that if we can't substantially improve my Hgb (at least get it back up in the 9's where it was before) I may have to start chemo, and it would probably last at least a month or two.
I'm a US expat living in Peru, and the only treatment that would be covered by my insurance here is FCR. My hematologist suggested that I would have more treatment options in the U.S., and since Medicare now caps medicine costs at $2000 for those who have Part D, and the quality of blood for transfusion is probably better controlled in the US, I would probably choose to do chemo there.
I have three children living and working in the US, two of them with children and with spouses who work. I have a sister and a brother about my age who have internet-based jobs and work at home. None of them live near each other. I've read a lot of different reports about how much work is involved in taking care of someone who's going through chemo, even some reports of people who have done it alone, and a lot of reports of people who continue working while doing chemo. I don't want to be a big burden to whomever I stay with during chemo. There's good public transportation in all of the places where my family members live, with reasonably short trips to a good cancer treatment facility. All of them are healthy people, but they have busy lives. Can I reasonably expect to complete chemo there without being a tremendous burden on one of them?