Largest real world study of acalabrutinib and ... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,514 members38,671 posts

Largest real world study of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib over 3 years, shows acalabrutinib has improved discontinuation rates

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator
2 Replies

We've had several posts in the last 24 hours about the U.S. government's plans to negotiate a price for ibrutinib. I mentioned healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo... , that the only remaining advantage ibrutinib/Imbruvica now has over later generation BTKi drugs is that you only needed to take it once per day. I omitted to mention that there is also independently confirmed evidence that ibrutinib can improve T cell function - I haven't seen this property mentioned for any of the other ~14 competing BTKi drugs approved or in clinical trials for the treatment of CLL. healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo... but that and the greater and longer term patient data is about it in terms of a competitive advantage if you exclude any cost advantage.

I also mentioned the lower discontinuation rate for acalabrutinib found in the head to head acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib clinical trial. Much of that is due to not to disease progression, but because those on ibrutinib found the side effects intolerable.

Coincidentally later today, Dr Toby Eyre tweeted about the First comparative effectiveness study of acalabrutinib (Calquence) and ibrutinib (Imbruvica) in real-world patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The study of 2,509 patients found that "The discontinuation rate at 12 months was 22% for the weighted acalabrutinib cohort vs 31% for the weighted ibrutinib cohort (P = .005). After additional adjustment for prior BTKi use, the acalabrutinib cohort had a 41% lower risk of discontinuation vs ibrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43-0.81; P = .001). In the largest available study comparing BTKis, patients with CLL receiving acalabrutinib demonstrated lower rates of discontinuation and a prolonged time to discontinuation vs those receiving ibrutinib."

ashpublications.org/bloodad...

Neil

Written by
AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeil
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
2 Replies
neurodervish profile image
neurodervish

Thank you Neil! This is one of the easier-to-read abstracts.

It confirms what we've seen for a while now. Alcala is better tolerated and causes fewer adverse side effects than Ibrutinib.

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator

The reasons for discontinuation are disease progression and intolerance of the drug side effects. Acalabrutinib was superior to ibrutinib for both categories.

Neil

You may also like...

Incorrect Interpretation of BTKis & Incidence of SPM

determine if rates of SPM remain elevated in CLL patients receiving these therapies.\\"...

Mode of Progression After Frontline Treatment Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With CLL

000 patients from three German CLL Study Group clinical trials has identified that unfit patients...

Zanubrutinib vs. Ibrutinib Patient Power Video by Dr. Jennifer Brown MD PHD

ence-report-cll-btk-inhibitors-update? Watch as Jennifer Brown, MD, PhD, Director, CLL Center, Dana

Good news on vaccine efficacy for the 80%

(322/486) of patients within the CLL-VR study following the first two vaccine doses compared to...

Acalabrutinib exhibits comparable efficacy, superior safety to ibrutinib for CLL (finally!)

fibrillation compared to patients treated with ibrutinib. Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart...