So is there general consensus among Armour users that it has been reformulated a second time; not going back to what it was pre-2009, but better than it was right after the first, unappreciated 2009 reformulation...?
I have to admit I never understood why Forest refused to communicate with customers/users after the 2009 reformulation which, it seems, set many patients back to square one...I understand Armour is now owned and manufactured by Actavis? What is their approach? More patient-friendly...?
Actually, it would be nice to know why Forest chose to reformulate Armour in the first place, when most patients seemed to do great on it as it was?!?!?