As far I know, NT was reformulated shortly after Armour, but is still considered a good drug given the number of positive reviews both here and elsewhere.
I'd be interested to hear form those of you who have tried both Armour and Nature-Throid since the reformulation; did you feel that NT was more effective?
I have been thinking about trying to find a pharmacy willing to substitute Armour for Nature-Throid, but I'd first like to hear from patients with first-hand experience of both.
I am currently on Erfa, but seem to need a lot (8 grains = 4x125 mg pills).
I feel better on Nature Throid. I can't quite put my finger on what it was, but Armour didn't suit me as well.
But in all honesty, I don't think you can use our experiences as a guide. Different formulations of NDT suit different people. You'll probably get quite a range of replies!
Hi Jackie I am now on Nature Throid and started just over a week ago. Started on 1 grain after one week now on 1 1/2 grains. I was on 75/100 T4 and T3 20mcgs. What would you say was the correct dosage round about please?
Hi Some people are on the basic 2 grains. I need more but I would not go up from 2 grains without a test for TSH, T4 and FT3. I take 4 grains now but started on 2
Jackie
Some say that, as Erfa contains less fillers, and no cellulose, it is more effective than for instance Armour and Nature-Throid. However, I find the 2 grain pills (125 mg) rather weak...has anyone else experienced that as well? I have been considering switching to 30 and 60 mg pills but, given the price of Erfa in Belgium, ordering 125 mg pills in 500 ct bottles is much more cost-effective...
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.