Hello, this is my first post. Here's a conundrum. Can anyone out there please help out? A 22 year old patient who last month tested positive for intrinsic factor antibodies in keeping with pernicious anaemia has remained symptomatic for B12 deficiency despite 7 months of oral cyanocobalamin 50 mcg per day and last month her blood tests demonstrated NORMAL active B12 (Holo-TC) and methylmalonic acid (MMA), but slightly raised total homocysteine (tHcy).
Her ongoing symptoms, which are typical of B12 deficiency, include depression, anxiety, brain fog, memory problems, headache, pain in her lower back and legs, sensitive tongue, bruising, extreme foot sensitivity, chronic urinary symptoms including cystitis, mouth ulcers, extreme fatigue.
Her total serum B12 responded following oral cyanocobalamin 50 mcg daily (together with 5mg folate daily) initiated by her GP in November 2020 by increasing from a low level of 201 ng/L back in December 2020 to 293 ng/L 2 months later and then a further marginal increase to 329 ng/L last month (normal range 211-911), that is after 7 months of oral cyanocobalamin (admittedly not a great increase in total serum B12 - she was still in the lower half of the 'normal' range for total serum B12). Last month further blood testing revealed that her active B12 (Holo-TC) was 137 (normal), MMA was 105 (also normal) and tHcy was 15.2 (slightly elevated). They were not measured at baseline (7-months ago) - i.e. prior to initiation of oral cyanocobalamin and folate.
I wonder, given the continuation of her severe symptoms and in spite of her now normal blood values of active B12 and MMA, could this patient STILL be B12 tissue deficient and if so, by what possible biochemical mechanism? A full spine MRI was normal. All other blood values including MCV were within the normal range when tested in December 2020 . A head MRI is now being considered.
A haematologist who recently reviewed the patient's blood results has concluded that since her active B12 is in the normal range there is no requirement for B12 loading, but there may be a place for 3 monthly B12 intramuscular supplementation which could either commence in the next 3 months or else it would be reasonable to take an annual active B12 test (Holo-TC) and commence im injection according to if and when active B12 is trending downward.
This is a quite reasonable and rational response to the blood data but this of course accepts the (unsatisfactory) status quo and essentially ignores her ongoing clinical symptoms. Recent reviews of B12 deficiency advise that in the event of any discordance between symptoms and laboratory results to rely on the symptoms. The BSH Guidelines state that the clinical picture is the most important factor in assessing the significance of test results assessing cobalamin status since there is no 'gold standard test to define deficiency
I should be very grateful for any comments regarding this apparent discrepancy between ongoing symptoms and normal Holo-TC and normal MMA. At the end of the day should she be treated conservatively as advised by the Haematologist, or else more aggressively e.g. by alternate days of intramuscular B12? i.e. essentially ignoring the normal Active B12 and MMA blood results. Personally, (given that we now know that she has pernicious anaemia from last month's positive Intrinsic Factor antibody test), I would prefer to see a trial of intramuscular hydroxocobalamin given every other day to see whether or not her symptoms respond and if they do then continuing until there is no further neurological improvement, But what do you think?
Thank you VERY much for your patience in reading and considering this. All contributions most gratefully received.
R.