I posted months ago about my ‘PIP’ debacle with the DWP. I’m 70 now and missed the April cutoff date in 2014 for just staying on my DLA by a few months, ending up with the torture of repeated PIP Assessments. This almost resulted in death - dreading my last but one home assessment I took too much Oramorph & Codeine as I was so stressed I’d forgotten if and when I’d taken my medication. I ended up in an induced coma for 4 days, my wife and family had been told I probably wouldn’t make it through the first night on the HDU and even if I did I would be brain damaged.
I survived - I know of many RA Patients who have died, labelled as suicide, who really died of this Privatised Out-sourced ‘we’ll pay you a bonus for every person you get off benefits’ in humane way. We (RA challenged) and other disabled people are assumed to be ‘Scroungers, Shirkers, Playing the System etc.’ and it’s left to us to prove otherwise. I’m ashamed that I became so psychologically ‘weak’ that I ended up using NHS time and putting my family through hell and that I let ATOS & The Government who employ them bully me into a corner. It was my Wife who faced them down for what this system has become - a cheap sure way to get a few million pounds off the benefits bill, and a real vote catcher with the public who believe we are malingering.
A quick Online search will reveal that ≈ 75% of ATOS assessments, where disabled patients have lost all or some of their PIP, get it all back at appeal. So we’re paying ATOS for each of the first PIP assessment (don’t forget I mentioned they get a bonus for each person removed from benefits) and then we pay ATOS again to do the appeal process. So we’re rewarding a Private Company for getting it wrong 75% of the time plus they don’t have to give the first tranche of bonuses back! A close inspection of the 3 times I’ve been either rejected or kept my PIP reveals absolutely no resemblance to the scoring I handed in at my assessments and agreed with the assessor (ATOS will tell you their assessors are fully medically trained - I’ve had a first year training Nurse needing extra part time income, a ‘first aider’ works employee trained to stick on plasters and someone who hadn’t worked as a Nurse for over 25 years.
I believe that after the assessors send their reports to the DWP there’s an army of non-medical clerks, following some sort of tick list, that do the final scoring - if I don’t think this then ATOS are so inept they really do just get it wrong 75% of the time.
The Good News (I’d hoped for all of us) but not really!
Amber Rudd, citing her own 80 year old blind Father, stated in Parliament early this year that it was very wrong to keep subjecting the +65s who are already on DLA/PIP, with long term conditions (like our’s), to repeat annual assessments. She stated this change was to be implemented ‘late spring’. I had many discussions with the DWP to actually confirm an actual date. My reassessment took place in the middle of this limbo period. I’ve finally received a DWP letter keeping me at the highest level of Mobility and Care rates (that I’ve been on for a few years, but have lost or been turned down in the past only to get back on appeal) AND that I will be next required to have a ‘Light Touch’ assessment in 2029. The relief of getting ATOS off my case is huge, my wife says I’ve shed 10 years off my face overnight. There is a BUT though from Rudd’s original statement - this new ‘Light Touch’ (what does that even mean, how would you use it in a sentence?) ONLY applies to NEW claimants over 65. Those (like me and Rudd’s Father) that missed the +65 2014 cut-off and who are already claiming PIP will have to have one more full (‘Heavy Touch?’) Assessment - shame on her for back pedalling and using her own Father’s distressful position.
I could easily wash my hands of this process having had my successful final assessment. I want to continue to help anyone on this website, NRAS or disabled to continue to highlight this decision. I can’t go on Marches but as I bluntly told my last assessor at my home following some ridiculous question “I do not have RA of the brain”! I’ve years of IT experience (I had to retire early in 2004 after getting RA in 1996 following a left ankle fusion and a right ankle replacement (which has just collapsed, shelf life is 10-15 years). When I retired in 2004 (aged 55) I was on £70k pa + £12k annual bonus + company car, to live on £12k a year pension. Initially I refused to even consider asking for Benefits or any help, until a disastrous holiday in Cornwall in 2009 where I found I could hardly walk anywhere, stupidly using my pension lump sump to make up our income. My wife (and that holiday) convinced me that I needed to apply for a Blue Badge. I know deep down I’m not a ‘Benefits Scrounger’ and I don’t think anyone disabled is, I was just stupidly too proud to accept benefits until the RA forced me to apply for something I should have had already.
The irony is that the cost to taxpayers of paying private firms like ATOS (they’ve tried rebranding online to ‘Independent Assessment Services‘ with formerly known as ATOS in tiny print at the bottom of their Webpage) to do both assessments and appeals far exceeds the cost when it was still run by the DWP, plus this does not include the cost of numerous IDS millions for failed software solutions and their implementation. The Government could have done NOTHING and saved a considerable amount of money (in the 100s of Millions) - I’ll let you decide what their real motives were?
You might wonder how I’m so knowledgeable in this area? Necessity, I wasn’t well enough to face the appeals, tribunals other than to attend. We have an old friend, a retired GP, who sat on the Appeal Tribunals and had other retired medical friends also involved in the initial assessments and the actual setup. She was paid £350 a day to be part of a 5 panel Tribunal Panel (the other 4 got £350 a day as well) at a total panel cost of £1,750 a day) to hear just 4-5 appeals. When she started to exceed the 75% Appeal success rate they got rid of her. From her other retired friends she heard that for initial assessments by ATOS or CAPITA the some or all of the following obstacle tactics were put in place. (1) Insisting that you went to their offices for the assessment up to and including ATOS paying for a Taxi to take you there - you had to jump through hoops (probably one of the things you can do on their tick sheets!) to get a home visit (Consultant & GP letters minimum requirements). (2) If you are driven to their assessment centre they give you (a) a parking space as far from the building as possible - they monitor with cameras you walking and getting out of the car (b) make the lift out of order (unless you’re in a wheelchair) forcing you to use the stairwell where you are observed by more cameras (c) their desk will be as far away as possible from the door you come in so they again observe your mobility.
I want to help anyone who is still having to go through this appalling process - just respond with your experience, I’m not letting go of trying to get the full changes that were initially promised by Amber Rudd implemented.
On a final lighter touch note - when my 2029 ‘light touch’ review is due, and I’ve probably died, I’ve asked my wife to insist on a home visit. When they arrive I’ve asked her to put my Urn complete with ashes on the table in front of them so they can still interview me. I’d hate to see ATOS lose out on charging the Government for a Home Visit just because I’m dead!
Dennis