cut or not? disadvantages of circumcission - Men's Health Forum

Men's Health Forum

35,877 members4,638 posts

cut or not? disadvantages of circumcission

fishfish profile image
7 Replies

is sensation lost after circumcision? what are the disadvantages of circumcision?

Written by
fishfish profile image
fishfish
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
7 Replies
jimfromcalif profile image
jimfromcalif

Most intact men would violently defend their foreskins for the pleasure it gives them.

fishfish profile image
fishfish in reply tojimfromcalif

thanks for the reply. can you answer my other questions also

jimfromcalif profile image
jimfromcalif in reply tofishfish

Surely. Circumcision always leads to a loss in sensation for two reasons. The first is the loss of 20,000+ nerves in the foreskin itself. The second results from the gradual process of keritinization of the glans, a thickening of the tissue. That is probably the greatest disadvantage. Another, subject to taste is the change in appearance.

timmyboy20 profile image
timmyboy20

There are no disadvantages. I am circumcised as an adult so unlike most anti-circumcision people I've known a before and after. I can assure you that I didn't have lost sensitivity. My glans is still very sensitive. The foreskin is nothing but a flap of skin to protect the glans from getting hurt if you would run naked through the woods. But since humans have developed, the foreskin has lost its original function. It's not the foreskin that produces the orgasm but the glans!

fishfish profile image
fishfish in reply totimmyboy20

how long have you been circumcised?

timmyboy20 profile image
timmyboy20

5 almost 6 years ago I've been circumcised. But I noticed no difference in sensitivity since then. Scientific research has shown that too. A Canadian research reported in The Journal of Urology® indicates that there are no differences in penile sensitivity for a variety of stimulus types and penile sites between circumcised and intact men. They also discovered that there is no difference in thickness of the glans! The anti-circumcision movement just want us to believe otherwise.

jaglad profile image
jaglad

Mine was due to possible cancer risk at age 52. Now all is fine but it was incredibly painful in the first few weeks. Sex can be more pleasurable now but overall I preferred having skin. With skin I had the option to pull back or not and sensation was with the foreskin and the shaft. Also I find masturbation was much easier and more satisfying before.

Each man has to make his own decision on their own needs but a word of warning. Circumcision may reduce the risk of HIV, or STDs, but it will not prevent it.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Cut or uncut?

Which is better ?
dannyuk profile image

Dick does not show full head

Hi , i am new here , i had a circumcision last Friday and i am currently on my 6th to 7th day. I...
Mpampasas profile image

Has anyone tried restoration of foreskin after healing from circumcision

Has anyone tried restoration of foreskin after healing from circumcision , their are some devices...
sagar99 profile image

Circumcision - Not a happy bunny

I had a circumcision on Monday - for medical reasons. Brief background - a few years ago my...
nheather profile image

2 months and 3 weeks after circumcision

Is been 2 months and 3 weeks after my circumcision I thinks is healing well but my scar feels...
Hemee8032 profile image

Moderation team

See all
Norwich1 profile image
Norwich1Moderator
jimpollard profile image
jimpollardPartner
mpntod profile image
mpntodPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.