Which is better ?
Cut or uncut?: Which is better ? - Men's Health Forum
Cut or uncut?
It depends ...If everything fine with your foreskin(you can pull all the way back), I wouldn't bother doing anything with it...
Yeah if it's not broken then don't fix it. I think every other factor depends on people experience and oppinion
Different not better.
For me better
Uncut! If there isn’t anything wrong and you can retract your foreskin! Leave it alone. It would be totally unnecessary and any sort of surgery carries a risk.
I know most people who are thinking about getting cut realy want to do it so our opinions don’t realy matter because in some sense your set in your decision. BUT like everyone one said, if it ain’t broke don’t fix it. There are risks that we don’t think about in long term. Impotence, study shows that most men suffering from impotence are circumcised. Next, you deal with he chance that you’ll be left looking like Frankenstein. Most men do this for medical reasons and most likely have a great experience from what they had before. You may be perfectly fine after being cut but that’s a change you will have to decide on.
Why I say this, I was cut almost 3 months now, and not happy with bumpy scar from my stitches, lost more that half of my sensations. So if you think sex will be better? Think not but that’s just my experience being on 3 months into it.
Good luck
Why were you circumcised?
I couldnt last as long as I wanted and cosmetically I thought it would look better. Now my whole head is numb and doesn’t feel like it did before. Oh yeah and my scar has bumps kinda like extra skin.
Had mine done 33 days ago I would say do it But make sure it gets done right do not get the low and tight which is where they remove more of the in their skin get a high entire high and lose sensation is 300% times better message me if you have any questions call for it you wi but make sure it gets done right do not get the low and tight which is where they remove more of the inner skin get a high and tight or high and loose 0 difference in sensation
You will get lots of opinions but the majority seem to say if you do not need circumcision then do not have one.
For me, I think it was better before.
And for me it was also MUCH better before I was circumcised - except for an incident when I suffered paraphimosis following sex with my wife. The last thing I wanted was circumcision, but my condition was an emergency. My foreskin was slit to release the oedema.
End result? I was properly circumcised.
But a circumcised penis will forever be a crippled penis.
Christopher
For me it is MUCH better now I'm circumcised. It looks and feels so much better than before. I am glad I got rid of that foreskin!
As I said lots of opinions. But my advice still applies.
If you need it, go for it. If you want it, think carefully.
Why are you asking?
Every girl or guy that has seen (or used) my circumcised penis says that it looks better than uncircumcised.
I got circumcised around 5 months ago due to very tight foreskin which prevented me from having sex so my procedure was absolutely necessary, doctors said stretching and steroid creams wouldn’t work.
I can’t comment on the pleasure during sex aspect surrounding circumcision as I’m only 17 and was a virgin before the procedure but I can say now that it still feels amazing!
I’m glad I got it done I love how it looks and feels etc but I’d still agree with other guys and say that unless you actually NEED to get it done then don’t bother. Save yourself the unnecessary pain and discomfort just to end up with something that essentially will fulfil the same function.
Hope this helps!