This appears to be coming up a few times from reading previous posts regarding PiP claims. People who have bought their own aids to facilitate an easier existence are being told they cannot count as proof of either disability/change in disability, because they have not been 'prescribed' by the GP.
Yet people are being told by their GPs that they don't prescribe things like walking sticks etc.
Further, it seems that one doesn't have to have them prescribed on the first place to use them as supporting evidence.
So what do the DWP personnel mean by 'prescribed?' From their point of view, do they perhaps mean 'advised?' Or do they mean referred to occupational therapy by consultant to 'make safe' a dwelling?
So if a GP or physiotherapist or consultant writes on your medical notes let's say you have meniere's disease (making this up as I go along) 'Patient advised to purchase a walking stick or install bath rail to prevent further falls during episodes of dizziness or imbalance' would this guiding note be counted as 'doctor prescribed' provided you could give proof of it and it was attached to your notes? Or still be dismissed?
A close family member has motor neurones and did receive aids such as adapted utensils, wheelchair, special cup, large keypad for phone, and an eye activated voice technology as well as wrist alert and alarm. An occupational therapist did install rails. These I'm assuming would have all come under 'prescribed' even though he still had to purchase some of them because they were stipulated as necessary by both the senior specialist nurse and the occupational therapist.
It would be good to have a clear idea what the DWP are talking about and why they appear to give conflicting responses.