The storm was nice to us... heavy rain stopped at 8:35... light drizzle at the start... dry from mile one for me... of course some of the super fast guys ran most of it in the rain 😂😂. Wind dropped... then at 10 the weather was atrocious again.
When I first bought my Garmin Forerunner, my treadmill runs were super fast! I was smashing 5k in 23 minutes. Once I added a foot pod and had a few outdoor runs to calibrate it it soon realised that I’m super slow as opposed to super fast!
We have to award Which! 10/10 for sheer stupidity. They claim to be the consumer champion but tested fitness trackers and running watches for accuracy over distance on a treadmill. That demonstrates their total lack of understanding about how these gadgets work.
An activity tracker without GPS is always going to estimate your stride length, count steps and then work out an approximation to distance covered. It has got no chance of being accurate. But if someone bought an activity tracker with no GPS, they are probably only interested in step count..
An activity tracker with GPS is going to calibrate its estimate of stride length during runs outside. It can build up a pretty good knowledge of your stride length at different running speeds, and then when used on a treadmill it is going to be more accurate. BUT... this relies on a period of calibration/training and the Which! report probably did not wear the activity tracker for 1 month in a variety of outdoor, gps-monitored runs before the treadmill test. So again, the Which! results are pointless.
Lastly, a running watch with GPS, optical heart-rate etc is going to be similar to the activity tracker with gps. But anyone buying a gps running watch is not going to run a marathon on a treadmill and care about the distance reported on the watch. So that is another Which! stupid test.
I’m wondering if they did the run in one go or had a relay going.. surely if they had marathon runners they would have just tested them this weekend! Of course they’d all have to run the blue line. As soon as they go relay even calibration of the device would be pointless. I do love an obviously flawed piece of science! Of course Apple Watch series 1 resale values have just risen 😂
Even more flawed science - no doubt they had a range of testers, each testing 5-10 trackers over a period of a few weeks. I doubt that one runner tested every tracker and so this just adds another level of variance.
Oh good. I drove through horrible weather to get to where I was running, and thought we were going to end up running in the rain, but then the skies cleared again as I arrived. 😊
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.