I finished BR treatment in August, following five years of W&W. I tolerated the treatment easily and it yielded great results: my blood counts are shockingly normal and a bone marrow biopsy six weeks after concluding treatment showed just 6% CLL involvement, down from 90+% beforehand.
However, a CT scan showed that I still have several mildly enlarged lymph nodes, in the 2-3 cm range. My CLL specialist declared me in partial remission as a consequence of the nodes. He was very encouraging and said not to worry about it.
Nonetheless, I can't help but feel I flunked a test in third grade. I wanted a complete remission, not something partial.
Does anyone know if there is any clinical significance to the "partial" label in terms of expected outcomes? In particular, does this indicate a shorter expected remission time? Even though I tolerated the last round of treatment well, it wasn't fun and I'm not looking forward to the next one.
Thanks.
Geoff
Washington, DC
Written by
Eagle5327
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.