Interesting report on the efficacy of... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

20,967 members26,122 posts

Interesting report on the efficacy of IMRT on prostate cancer

Don_1213 profile image
12 Replies

An 8-year study comparing the results of various cancer treatments concluded that IMRT is equal to or in some cases superior to other treatments such as brachytherapy and surgery.

Among the numbers mentioned were: "Men with localized prostate cancer who are treated with external-beam radiation therapy have a cure rate of 95.5% for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and 91.3% for high-risk prostate cancer.

The 5-year survival rate using this treatment is 98.8% overall."

targetingcancer.com.au/2015...

Written by
Don_1213 profile image
Don_1213
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
12 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

This was just based on a literature review - many better studies since then.

Don_1213 profile image
Don_1213 in reply to Tall_Allen

Allen - could you track down the original paper by Shakespeare? I tried and failed..

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to Don_1213

I'm really not interested- it is old and outmoded.

Concernedwife24 profile image
Concernedwife24 in reply to Tall_Allen

Do you know a recent study for men who had rp and then rt and ADT vs rp and adt alone? My goal is to see if adjuvant et is worth it? Does it increase OS?

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to Concernedwife24

I don't understand - why would anyone have RP+ADT?

Concernedwife24 profile image
Concernedwife24 in reply to Tall_Allen

Maybe I didn't say it clearly.

Gleason 9. Stage t3b. Post PSA 4.8.

I was told by the surgeon that radiation does not increase life expectancy. Yet I see most guys do get adjuvant or salvage radiation .

Just wanted to see if there are any studies proving that radiation helps with OS if added to rp, adt.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to Concernedwife24

OS is a very difficult endpoint to use in randomized clinical trials of men with biochemical recurrence. The "problem", if you can call it that, is that men live too long for a short- term trial to have enough deaths to track a difference. It will usually take about 15 years for the difference to become apparent, and funding for the trials don't last that long. For that reason, clinical trials use "surrogate endpoints," which means endpoints that we know (based on other studies) are causally related to overall survival. So, in JCOG0401, which only had median follow-up of 5.5 years, "time to treatment failure" was used as the surrogate endpoint. They found that after 5.5 years of follow-up, that the percent of men who failed treatment was almost twice as large (179%) if they were only treated with permanent ADT (bicalutamide at the time of PSA-recurrence and ADT when that failed) compared to those treated with salvage RT+ADT (ADT only if treatment failed).

europeanurology.com/article...

(It's also worth noting that the salvage radiation dose in that trial was below the dose now considered curative - the study began in 2004, before it was known)

Concernedwife24 profile image
Concernedwife24 in reply to Tall_Allen

Thank you. We saw dr kishan by video conference today. Dropped your name.

He thinks radiation would be a very good thing for my husband and we agree. Thank you for the referral. It is over an hour each way from our house but he sounds like he will be the best at what we need.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply to Concernedwife24

I am a very big fan of his.

kreg001 profile image
kreg001

I’m in the 5% that had biochemical recurrence after RT and going into it with Gleason7 (3,4) we were all surprised. Should have been slam dunk gone. I’m alive ten years later so that statistic still applies.

In hindsight I wonder if a mistake was made starting RT in November and interrupting the regularly spaced treatments for two and a half weeks over the holidays. Selfish trip to visit grandchildren.

It’s my understanding the radiation kills cancer while the cancer cells are undergoing mitosis, cell division. But mitosis of cancer cells is a bit erratic. I fear that during my holiday break a lot of new cancer cells were formed. Perhaps some of them escaped being zapped in subsequent cell divisions. Nice Monte Carlo problem.

It’s just a thought. No real science. And, if I had it to do over I’d still do RT but with no interruptions. Amazing machines. Lovely technicians. And RT avoids risks of surgery.

As it turned out salvage brachytherapy also failed after a few years so maybe my PCA wasn’t as localized as hoped for in the RT days.

In 2004, the numbers for RP compared to Brachytherapy plus IMRT for a Gleason 7 were exactly the same..... 92-94%.

GD

I agree only ,because I fall into this category ...Whoohoo! I just made five years ,I’m going after five more .. Thanks Don!

You may also like...

New prostate cancer treatment concept

immunotherapy and radiation therapy may be a powerful treatment approach for castration-resistant...

Very interesting article. Prostate cancer 'cured' by shocking prostate cancer with testosterone.

telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/11/30/man-cured-prostate-cancer-doctors-shock-tumour-death-testosterone

Study reports direct targets of ivermectin in prostate cancer

Ku70/Ku80 as direct targets of ivermectin in prostate cancer Shidong Lv, Zeyu Wu, Mayao Luo, Yifan...

Stage 4 Prostate cancer

had prostate cancer. After 28 bioposies 27 was cancer. Gleason score 8. 1 week later had prostate...

Prostate Cancer Therapy:

Prostate Cancer Therapy: I'm new and recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Urologist only wants...