Hi Folks... looking for shared wisdom/thoughts/opinions/experiences to help me in my current decision point.
I've made it into my 50s, living with cancer for about 8 years now...
2012: Diagnosis Gleason 4+4=8 and tx with Cyberknife (PSA 21)
2014: Scans confirm metastatic disease confirmed in lungs and one bone lesion (PSA 10), tx with 6 rounds Docetaxel and begin Lupron/Casodex
2018: PSA first becomes detectable after 3+ years on Lupron/Casodex, discontinue Casodex but no appreciable drop in PSA. Approved and received Provenge.
2019: April: Biopsy to investigate blood clots in urine shows cancer cells in urethra bladder opening (PSA .07). December: Scan finally show new tumor growth - bone lesion, pelvic lymph node, new nodules in lungs (PSA 1.23)
Present day- time to bring on a new obstacle to the cancer growth. Doctor recommends Xtandi (enzalutimide). I'm wondering about going back to chemo first with Cabazitaxel. My thinking was inspired by this recent study (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/315... "CONCLUSIONS:
Cabazitaxel significantly improved a number of clinical outcomes, as compared with the androgen-signaling-targeted inhibitor (abiraterone or enzalutamide), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had been previously treated with docetaxel and the alternative androgen-signaling-targeted agent (abiraterone or enzalutamide)."
What would you do and why?
Would Cabazitaxel make me ineligible for PARP inhibitor studies? (My doc says I have to fail on Xtandi first... I have a CHEK2 mutation).
I am also in contact with a different doc who is doing interesting things with various cancers including PCa, using low-dose metronomic chemo and alternating treatments. I'm bringing these questions to both docs. Any experience with this decision process would be welcome. In the end, I believe there is no "right" answer, I'll just do the best I can with the tools and information I've been given and live with the results (and eventually die with the results as well.)
It feels a bit more sad and scary at this point, because most treatments seems to be talking in terms of months instead of years.
Thanks for your consideration and any responses...