I've read that many doctors in South Africa avoid treatments, particularly chemo. You may wish to look into the availability of Ac-225-PSMA-617. That treatment was used in a pilot study in S. Africa:
Please explain the medical reasoning of physicians who say no to treatment, as we see in Frizzee's situation. What could possibly justify that decision?
I can't. There are some weird medical notions in S. Africa. There was much resistance to antiretroviral therapy for HIV there, even though S. Africa/Lesotho has the highest per capita incidence of HIV in the world.
The oncologist explanation was that he should go home and enjoy a quality life as Chemo will not have any positve effect on his life. He is avery experienced and well liked oncologist. However the urologist insisted, as my husband was otherwise in very good health. Yes, we did go to another oncologist - however the 2 oncologists did communicate before treatment started.
I was diagnosed with Gleason 9 at 58. Did IMRT radiation and full ADT. In remission for more than 10 years with Dr. Myers. At the time, I was doing triathlons. Dr. Myers told me to either ride a recumbent bike (which I don't like) or at least stand up every five minutes for thirty seconds to allow blood to flow. Still try to stand up on the bike as much as possible.
Your oncologist sounds like a lazy SOB. Why does he think any of the many treatments aren't good? What does he do while at the clinic if all he can say is go home and don't bother me?
Good on you for continuing training for the Cycle Tour; be sure to let us know how you do in it. We're rooting for you to win!
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.