I have been on Armour for about 10 years and NatureThroid before that. I’ve been doing fine. My doctors office called me today and said that NDT is not recommended for people over 65 because of cardiovascular issues. Has anyone heard this?
NDT for older people: I have been on Armour for... - Thyroid UK
NDT for older people
Did they elaborate on this? NDT tends to suppress the TSH and many doctors think that causes heart disease (as they interpret a low TSH to mean hyperthyroidism).
Hi there,
She just said that there was a study done that said older people shouldn’t take NDT.
Yes, well, 'a study' can show anything you want it to. Doesn't mean it's right. Sounds to me more like they just don't want to keep prescribing and they're using this as an excuse. I was over 60 when my doctor put me on Armour, and he was a hormone specialist, not just a mere GP.
You could be right. Last month they only sent in a 30 day supply instead of the normal 90 days. Thank you!
They cannot suddenly withdraw your NDT that would be detrimental to your health
What do they think we took before the artificial Synthroid? Years ago that is what we all took and everyone was well they did not go by TSH or blood tests doctors went by symptoms and how the patient felt
I would be arguing my case with them if I was you and make sure they know how ill this will make you feel if you have to take levothyroxine instead of NDT
Believe me, I will.
It's not true. Lies put out by big pharma.A consistent Free T4 of over 22 is a risk of cardiovascular issues.
There is no evidence at all that a low TSH or a high FT3 or NDT causes cardiac issues
Ask for the empirical evidence.
Yes, my husband who is almost 90 was told about the risk of atrial fibrillation but he is absolutely fine on Armour Thyroid . He has been taking it for the last 8 years after 12 years of misery on Levothyroxine. Why dont they talk about risks from Levo? With regular testing and monitoring there should be no problem of using Armour. Three members of my family are on Armour (purchased privately) switching from Levothyroxine and all three are doing much better than on Levo. @The decision to discourage the use of Armour must be, to an extent, financially motivated.
I suspect the AGS Beers Criteria are the source - but could well be wrong.
The 2019 version is at the link below but inaccessible to me:
American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults
agsjournals.onlinelibrary.w...
The 2023 version is at the link below:
American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults
By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Entry point to 2019 version - link in right Recommendations bar::
agsjournals.onlinelibrary.w...
Actual 2023 document:
agsjournals.onlinelibrary.w...
However, whilst we can read it online, we cannot print it, nor copy from it and, the final straw, cannot search it.
The evidence seems to be largely documentary.
The quality of evidence can be Low.
The strength of the recommendations can be Weak.
A lot of recommendations are conditional - for example, if Creatinine Clearance is below a certain level. Not absolute. But you can be quite sure that the mere mention of a medicine will be interpreted by some as “DO NOT USE”.
You can calculate your Creatinine Clearance rate using a calculator if you have your blood creatinine level and basic body parameters:
Creatinine Clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation)
mdcalc.com/calc/43/creatini...
You might be shocked at the number of medicines which are advised against. Including, for example, almost all antihistamines.
In what I found, relying on visual search or what is accessible, I saw nothing about thyroid. But it is so very easy to miss things - if you find anything, let me know, I'll happily update this reply.
Wow, thank you. I will read it when I come back from my doctor appointment.
I did glance at the report before I left, and saw nothing regarding the thyroid.
So they have LOW quality evidence but assert a STRONG recommendation.
And there won't be a single word about the issues of implementing de-prescribing of desiccated thyroid.
Chett
They didn’t even mention it at my appointment.
I have been on either NDT or a combination of T4/T3 for 25 years (high dose) and I am 85, no bone problems. I did have a touch of osteopenia last year, in one wrist, but taking a calcium/D3 supplement, I think it must have healed because I do not get any pain in my wrist or any problems. They have been warning me of sudden heart attacks and osteoporosis for the past 25 years. The latest that has recently come out that it is levothyroxine that can cause bone problems. If one thinks logically old age brings on a lot of problems including heart attacks - in people who have never had NDT. When I first started onT3 from a private doctor, my GP would blame everything I had on T3. If I had a cold or a broken toe he would blame T3. This is my own personal view (I am not medical), but I think the T3 is what is keeping me well and my heart quite strong. I recently had an echocardiogram and doctor said my heart is strong for quite a few years yet, I have had diabetes for 40 odd years, and I am very overweight, things that are known to contribute to heart attacks. I know everybody is different, but this is my experience.
it’s rubbish
I have been on NDT (3 grains)for 20 years and I am 81. I did a private test last week and my T4 was 19 and my T3 was 6. I feel good on these results. This week I had an ECG and it was perfect so I would ignore his study.
They said the same for HRT without evidence. I will take my NDT and HRT clutched in my cold dead hands to the next life!
Please dont fall for this Chett.
Ask for written evidence and the equivalent on Levothyroxine studies.
Every best wish , G.