Dr P and Wiki info

[UrsaP]

Has anyone looked at Wiki lately for Dr P? It is dreadful. First statement!

Obviously written by the anti T3/NDT squad!

Anyone know how to get this improved...less bias? I know it is WIKI and therefore....but people still look.

[helvella Administrator Thyroid UK]

You can sign up as an editor of Wiki and make changes.

I have heard of pages which have become battlegrounds with one party making changes and another party reverting them... Again and again.

But the few changes I have made have been technical (spellings, dead links, what have you) as I have never got into wholesale revision.

[UrsaP in reply to helvella]

Just think it is so awful. Propaganda all around us! Much of it subliminal.

[Angel_of_the_North]

Wikipedia has a political agenda and is not trustworthy. It often shows up as anti-alternative health, anti-semitic and pro-"establishment" (big pharma, big agric etc). You can sign up as an editor, but if you start to tell the truth, your articles will be re-edited and you'll be "struck off". I wouldn't use it and I wouldn't let school kids use for homework as it is (in some cases) rewriting history

[UrsaP in reply to Angel_of_the_North]

Yes appreciate it has very many issues. And same would not recommend anyone to use it without checking info given for sure, certainly not in the school environment. I was just so infuriated to see the blatant biased way the info on Dr P was written. A hero in my view. I have passed it on and hopefully it will be getting sorted.