New Research from our Advisers: Our advisers have... - Thyroid UK

Thyroid UK

137,936 members161,765 posts

New Research from our Advisers

lynmynott profile image
lynmynottPartnerThyroid UK
3 Replies

Our advisers have now written another paper discussing the thyroid function tests and how they should look at all the tests for a diagnosis, not just the TSH. Dr Midgley explained to me, "In summary what it shows is that combining TSH, FT4 and FT3 values together for each patient is a more accurate way of diagnosing and distinguishing patients in normality and abnormality."

Let's hope the medical community start looking at diagnosis in this way sooner rather than later.

You can see the paper here: journal.frontiersin.org/art...

Written by
lynmynott profile image
lynmynott
Partner
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
shaws profile image
shawsAdministrator

Oh, how I hope the endocrinologists sit up and take notice. There have been quite a few positives in the past which have been ignored completely.

It is really scandalous that more thought hasn't been given to the FT4 and FT3 in patients who are still complaining.

Thanks again to Dr Midgeley and team.

shaws profile image
shawsAdministrator

I hope this is taken up by the Endocrinology to forward the appropriate care urgently needed by many on this forum. This part, for me, stood out:-

This demonstrates that statistical analytic techniques heavily influence current TSH-reliant thyroid disease classification. Hence, joint application of the dual roles of TSH as a sensitive screening test and an accurate diagnostic tool becomes highly questionable and consequently the roles must be separated from each other. The current classification of the disease entities of subclinical hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, which is solely based on abnormal TSH values when thyroid hormones concentrations remain within their respective reference ranges, seems no longer tenable (31, 32). New markers for clinical endpoints or tissue-based definitions of thyroid function are therefore urgently needed. Over-reliance on TSH as a gold standard has long impeded the advancement of the field, since the first doubts were raised and disagreements emerged on the setting of the reference intervals (34–54). While sole reliance on TSH must therefore be scaled back, good clinical practice taking into account the full history and symptoms displayed by a patient has to be re-instituted as a primary tool (65, 66).

nightingale-56 profile image
nightingale-56

Another good paper from Dr Midgley and team. We need him to head a specialist Endocrine Hospital in this country!

You may also like...

New paper published by our advisers

other papers that they hope to get published so we look forward to seeing those. Dr John Midgley...

Vote for our advisers' research!

popular paper over the last 2 years of publication. Our advisers have had a research paper...

Researching from scratch

I saw a different doctor yesterday who looked at the same test results from 3 months ago and said I...

advise please New test restults from the gp

from a test dated 5/1/18 ( the tyroid uk i have written is old.it was used incase the gp wasnt...

new to group and need advise.

additional fee T3 test be done are ft3 4.8 range 4.3 - 6.8 Ft4 13.1 range 7.7 - 15.1 TSH 0.76 range...