Let me preface (what's going to be an incredibly long post) with the fact that I know nothing about dopamine agonists or augmentation, except that the suffering it causes is more than I can bare. So first off, congrats to Kaarina, Jools, Elisse, Madlegs, Manerva and all those on here who tirelessly respond to those suffering from augmentation, whereas I look the other way...until today/tonight.
My ruminating began with the thought that there must be one DA that is least likely to cause augmentation. There is - Neupro - aka Rotigotine. Ok, good, I guess. But why? It's gotta have something to do with mode of action, right? Maybe? Neupro is what I call a broad spectrum DA. I made that term up, or rather I borrowed it from its use in regards to antibiotics. By broad spectrum I mean it somewhat evenly agonizes (but still favors D3) all five receptors - D1 thru D5. The worst in terms of augmentation is Prami which really is only an agonist at D2 and D3 but favors D3. Ropinerole is also an agonist at D4 and D5 as well as D2 and D3, but favors D3 as well.
Get to the point, right? As it turns out, augmentation, and maybe RLS in general, is really a tale of two cities/dopamine receptors. I always thought that all DAs do is beat the living crap out of our already lousy D3 receptors. Oh, DAs are so much more evil than that. They also upregulate our D1 receptors, which give off "excitatory" signals. I actually found an article which seems to indicate it really is not so much the down-regulation of our D3 receptors as it is the up-regulation of the D1 receptors that causes augmentation HELL. So picture this, not only are the good receptors all tuckered out by the DAs, but they also up-regulated the evil D1 receptors, which are now acting similar to a live wire applied to our spines. Who here ever heard of such a thing? Hmmm? Show of hands please? And here's the article that taught me this: sciencedirect.com/science/a...
And this confusing, but truly fascinating article too: frontiersin.org/articles/10... Btw, D3KO refers to mice that had their D3 receptors "knocked out."
So once again, I know what you're thinking - get to the frickin point. The point is, Neupro provides relief to RLS symptoms, but is less likely to cause augmentation because it does not up-regulate D1 receptors, it actually down-regulates them, just like it does to our D3 receptors. So maybe people should switch to Neupro and then taper down from there? The Neupro will get those D1 beasties under control a little bit. Maybe that combined with a little opiate and/or Gaba will alleviate some of that withdrawal hell. Also, if you want to avoid augmentation then be sure you have robust iron stores. Some of the articles I read indicate that augmentation is less likely to occur in people with normal Ferritin.
Last, but not least, someone figured this all out before me and may well be the next medical millionaire. He supposedly has a substance that will keep our D1 receptors at bay and thus augmentation as well, allowing people to stay on DAs longer and maybe have less symptoms when discontinued? I don't know. What do the DA experts on here think? earls.eu/blog/2021/5/9/the-....
Well folks, I have truly come full circle here on RLS-UK. I actually had the answer 6 years ago and didn't even know it. I truly am Little Miss Know it All healthunlocked.com/rlsuk/po...
Kaarina, do I win the longest (and most meaningless) post of the month award?
Little last minute addition here about Neupro's mode of action: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/253...