RE COVID VACCINATION

[timbowPSP]

The question I just posted is for ME, with PSP, and for my GRAND DAUGHTER with seizures. THANKS. ..... Be Happy! Timbow

[Richard33]

Timbow.

Just to say - you can edit any post you put up. The button is there somewhere on the screen. I will encourage Ruth to have the vaccine and I will too - as it must be the better option. But let's not be the first in line!

Richard

[timbowPSP in reply to Richard33]

TIMI shall keep well away from joining any 'jab line' - well until the hysteria dies down. Especially after reading this letter from Dr Yeadon to Matt Hancock.

Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020, 07:16

Subject: Letter to Hancock re misrepresentation of vaccine safety

This is a copy/paste of a letter posted on FB

Dear Mr Hancock,

I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco - acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.

I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset.

All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months.

If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.

This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.

My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t), Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development- should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern.

And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing.

You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else.

It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do.

Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion.

I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus.

Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used.

I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis.

You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?

Dr Michael Yeadon

Sorry if this seems like a damper on ur enthusiam, but 'better safe than sorry'.

Cheers Timbow

[Richard33 in reply to timbowPSP]

Timbow. That is a convincing argument why to be hesitant about taking the vaccine. I have heard other experts say the same. (Off-guardian.org has been a good counterbalance to the hysteria of the government and media.) The difficulty in this pandemic is getting reliable information, so much misinformation out there. I will look up Dr Yeadon and see if he is real! Frankly enough to be dealing with without all this sh1t!

Richard

[timbowPSP in reply to Richard33]

I received that letter from a friend who really knows her facts, and is hot on the trail of information .... so I'll be really interested in what you find out! Timbow

[Richard33 in reply to timbowPSP]

Timbow. He is all over the internet so clearly is genuine. Interesting radio interview on BBC Talk Radio facebook.com/watch/?v=78066.... He puts forward an interesting case. I do sometimes feel that we are all being hoodwinked on massive scale. But then I cannot get too excited about it, when dealing the reality of the day to day of caring for someone with CBD. Keeping the wine glass full! Richard

[timbowPSP in reply to Richard33]

Yes hoodwinked indeed. I suspect even the government is pretty powerless .... under the thumb of an agenda much wider and more dangerous. Didn't Medusa keep growing another head each time one was severed? But even that was overcome (I think by Odysseus?)..... more more wine pls waiter! ...... Timbow

[messier in reply to timbowPSP]

It's important to be aware that the safety of new vaccines will be tracked very carefully by the regulator (well in the UK at least). The 'yellow card system' would be ramped up for any new vaccine that is rolled out and the companies are required to analyse and report on the safety too. So even when any vaccine moves from clinical trials to clinical roll out the information will be collected and the regulator would require action to be taken in response to safety information.