Hi Blossompossum. A Positive AMA test is the reliable indicator of PBC. I'm AMA negative and also had to have a liver biopsy which confirmed the diagnosis. The test was nothing to worry about and was certainly much better than not knowing what was wrong with me. I was waiting for two years to get the biopsy and the diagnosis as they'd only do it after all other avenues had been explored. I wish I'd have had it done first! All the best x
Hi. Yes positive ANA but have had autoimmune disorders for 25 years. I don't know about SMA, sorry. My initial symptoms were extensive pain, extreme fatigue, weakness and being unwell all the time. The Docs initially suggested I had a form of hepititis and I had to wait six months before they would even do any further tests. Then I had ultrasound, MRI and ERCP (all clear). I had to wait around 3 months for each subsequent test and finally had the biposy over two years after my initial visit to GP. x
Yes it can be possible to have PBC with a negative for AMA. (ANA is normally positive if one has AIH (auto-immune hepatitis). Know I had both AMA (positive result) and ANA (negative) but not sure about the other one you mention SMA so can't say if that was included in mine or not. (Don't think was as I got a print-out of letter from hospital consultant to my GP and it just stated the ANA and AMA only.)
Apparently if you are testing negative for the AMA in particular, then normally the next step is a biopsy if you are experiencing elevated/abnormal LFTs. That would have been suggested to me had it not thought I had PBC due to fatigue and itching and the AMA hadn't shown positive.
At the time of my diagnosis, 10yrs ago, I was AMA and ANA negative, but still the biopsy confirmed PBC stage 2.I've never saw a test for SMA for me. I have had the ESR elevated twice. The pain clinic dr. thought I had RA because of this elevation in the beginning, but I don't.
In the beginning my AST and ALT were elevated but are not at the present. My ALK phosphatase has been elevated for more than 20 yrs.
Sma I guess I similar to the ana test. For the 10% of people that have pbc but are ama negative then the ana and sma test are posotive for around 50% of people with pbc that test negative for ama.
Here is a journal written article I was looking at today, interesting. CONCLUSION: AMA-negative PBC patients are characterized by relatively lower levels of serum IgM and a higher prevalence of serum ANA/SMA and are not associated with substantial differences in the clinical biochemical and histological spectrum of the disease
Hi there I am AMA negative with raised alk phos,GGT and Igm .I had a liver biopsy which showed changes in my bile ducts a few years ago.My consultant diagnosed me with pbc about 4 years ago because of my history and other results even though I am AMA negative and I was started on urso medication 2 years ago..I went to see my Consultant last week and he's testing my AMA again because he said you can change from negative to positive in time.It might be worth asking to have it checked again in a year or so.The biopsy wasn't too bad,just felt a bit bruised for a few days after.
ANA can be positive in several AI conditions, lupus for one, I think. None of them are that accurate. They just help as pointers/markers. Drs have to rule things in and rule things out, partly why it can take so bloody long to get a dx label and the right treatment. And then there are all the variants, like people who have features of more than one disease, but a missing marker. Me for example!! (I have ANA but no AMA, think I am SMA pos,, fairly unchanged over a decade or so, and features of PBC and AIH on biopsy). It's all quite complicated.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.