Sorry if you’re getting sick of me posting, but I’m trying to understand what’s going on with my body.
I’ve just been to pick up one of my blood test results, taken on Tuesday, which I’ve posted. I’ve been telling my GP surgery for weeks that I don’t feel well at all, my recent private tests show very low B12, and issues with MCV and MCMH (?)
I’m not sure what these new results mean? They don’t look normal to me, but I’m very new at this...
Written by
HappyKatieA
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
My personal opinion is that if a person is symptomatic for B12 deficiency and other causes of symptoms have been excluded then they should be treated whatever the results of b12, Active B12, MMA, Homocysteine etc.
Have a close look at the detail on the flowchart from BSH Cobalamin and Folate Guidelines, especially on right side of flowcart.
My understanding is that it's saying that if second line tests eg Active B12, MMA, Homocysteine are normal but the patient responds to B12 then a continuation of treatment should be considered.
If you have neuro symptoms, have you asked for a referral to a neurologist?
Perhaps GP could explain why there is a note on blood test result by serum b12 that says "okay for this patient".
I note that on your private results on other thread Active B12 was below range 22.9 (ref range 25.1 - 165) but is above range on these results.
In the 3rd link at top of this post, it mentions a ref range for Active b12 of >70 pmol/L and that results between 25 and 70 pmol/L should have an MMA test.
I'm curious at to why ref range on the Active B12 test in your photo is >30 pmol. There is quite a difference between >30 and >70 pmol. Just wondering if correct reference range has been used.
If the test was carried out at St Thomas' hospital in UK then I would expect the ref range to be >70 pmol/L
Perhaps your GP would consider ordering an MMA test.
I have no idea why my active B12 has gone up, the only differential is the time of day the test was done, the private at 7am, the GP 11.30am
I’m struggling to understand why my GP has made notes to say this is normal, I really don’t understand! He knows my concerns, and I thought he was finally listening on Monday.
I’m still waiting on other tests results: Autoantibody screen, Coeliac Screen and Intrinsic Factor Antibodies, I’m hoping these shed some more light. Do you know how long these usually take?
the notes may not necessarily have been made by your GP - more likely they were from the lab but I'm totally confused by them and how anyone can conclude that serum B12 is 'OK for this patient'.
have you asked the GP what the comments mean and who made them ...
The serum B12 is flagged up as being abnormal (the asterisk) which makes the comment even more baffling ... and may be it doesn't really relate to the result at all but the test sample.
All I can do really is confirm that you are well and truly justified in feeling perplexed.
I'm not medically trained but this might mean something to someone
"Holotranscobalamin (hTC): this marker is being examined as a more specific marker for vitamin B12 absorption capabilities. hTC is transcobalamin bound to vitamin B12 and can be a measure of the true functional serum vitamin B12 levels. hTC may be the first marker to be detected with vitamin B12 deficiency. Levels of hTC <35 picograms/L can be consistent with vitamin B12 deficiency, and may be considered, but this test is not widely available."
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.