Concerned about results : I’ve just been comparing... - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,874 members15,189 posts

Concerned about results

lizzziep profile image
23 Replies

I’ve just been comparing some blood test results, first two from haematology, third from GP

29th May 2024

RBC 2.68 10*12/L

WBC 5.5

Haemoglobin 78 g/L

Haematocrit 0.24

RDW 19.4

Nucleated RBC 1/100 WBC H

Platelets 281

Blast cells 0

27th June 2024

RBC 2.66 10*12L

WBC 5.9

Haemoglobin 78

Haematocrit 0.23

RDW 19.0

Nucleated RBC 1/100

Blast cells 0

Platelets 227

1st July 2024

RBC 2.52

WBC 5.9

Haemoglobin 76

RDW 19.1

Platelet 254

Blast cells 0.2 10*9/L

Comment - Disease progression?

All other results in normal levels, including WBC, I put those in for comparison

So, previously I haven’t had any blast cells but only a few days after my test results from haematology the GP requested blood test results shows 0.2 10*9L, followed by the comment “disease progression?”

I don’t know what percentage this is, should I be worried about it? I don’t see the haematologist until 23rd July, should I contact them and see what they say? Is my MF progressing to AML?

I have post ET MF and several mutations including ASLX1, and TET. Otherwise I am well. I take 2 x 20 mg Rux per day, plus aspirin and EPO injections.

At my last haematology appointment the doctor said everything was stable, results have been very similar for the last 3 or 4 months. Could things change in just a few days?

Any input will be appreciated.

Written by
lizzziep profile image
lizzziep
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
23 Replies
hunter5582 profile image
hunter5582

Sorry to hear about the worry regarding possible disease progression. I would be hesitant to interpret a single finding with a difference from June 27 Blast Cells = 0 to July 1 Blast Cells = 0.2. As I understand it, for the Blast Cells to increase so rapidly in just four days in unusual but not impossible. It is an indicator that your need a prompt response to this finding. While it could just be an anomalous finding, you do not want to assume that it is. I would think that at a minimum, your care team would want to repeat the CBC ASAP.

I would consider this to be an emergent issue and would not wait until July 23 to review the finding. Hopefully, this is just an artifact. If the finding is confirmed however, then it needs immediate attention. Waiting would not be in your best interests.

Hopefully this will turn out to be a tempest in a teapot. Please do let us know what you the findings are and how you are getting on. Until then, you will be in thoughts and prayers.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply tohunter5582

Thank you

LIGEBA profile image
LIGEBA in reply tohunter5582

How are blast cells labeled on a CBC with Differential (if there is nothing that actually says "Blast Cells"?

hunter5582 profile image
hunter5582 in reply toLIGEBA

I suspect that means that the Blast Cells were not looked for on that panel. My routine CBC panels do not include them either. It does show when a Peripheral Blood Smear was done. CBCs and blood smears can detect blasts. I expect that this particular lab has to be specified when the doctor is writing the order.

LIGEBA profile image
LIGEBA in reply tohunter5582

Ahhh. Ok. So hard to keep up with all the names and acronyms sometimes. Appreciate the clarification.

jointpain profile image
jointpain

From our experience of GPs the note written will just show the GP doesn't know anything about MF or patients. I worry that my wife's MF maybe progressing to AML, but only because her neutrophils are often ten to twenty times normal. Speak to the Hematology consultant.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply tojointpain

Thank you

EPguy profile image
EPguy

I have found some relevant info on these numbers. But before getting too deep, I see that your two results from hematology are ok, only the GP result is off. As Hunter says, a change that fast brings uncertainty. So you should request another reading from hematology, and opinions from the specialist. Also inquire whether the lab providers were the same or used the same procedures.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply toEPguy

Thank you, the same lab, at the hospital, does the GP’s and haematology tests.

Hatchie profile image
Hatchie

I have post ET MF also with ASXL1. I've been getting bloods taken weekly for the past 6 months and my blasts one week can be zero and then up to 3% then back to zero. My heamtology specialist said it's nothing to worry about. I was told it's only a sign of progression if it continually and constantly rises.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep

Thank you. Hopefully that’s will be the case with me.

Carol0925 profile image
Carol0925

Sorry to read this. Hopefully 🙏 it’s a one off. Thinking of you and please keep us posted.

artydutch profile image
artydutch

I am sorry to read about your concerns. As far as I know the bloods results on blast can vary. I have had some results with 2 % and some with zero and in between. As long as they stay under 5% there is no real concern, as the bloodtest is only ever a snapshot. Can you contact the Hematology nurse to ask on how to interpret this result? Good luck!

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply toartydutch

Thank you. I’m waiting for the specialist nurse to call me back.

ainslie profile image
ainslie

I wouldn’t assume anything just from those labs, first thing is results can fluctuate a bit anyway due to simple things such as hydration etc, I noticed years ago when venisecting my counts varied depending on where and when the blood was drawn, if I had bloods taken at the hospital the results were different to at GP even although the blood went to the same lab, I don’t know exactly why that was, maybe at clinic it goes straight to lab but at GP can lie around for a few hours, time of day and level of hydration can make a substantial difference. Many docs have told me never assume anything from one test, it’s the trend thats relevant.

I don’t know much about blasts but if I recall correctly your level is not concerning and can fluctuate. One to ask your Haem.

However, we are patients not docs so my advice would try to speak to you Haem sooner to get some re assurance and maybe do another blood test ideally at clinic, try to do similar time of day and hydration. Your Haem may suggest waiting a few weeks.

I would also say that if your Haem said all was stable at your last appt which appears to be 27 June it’s likely to be the case still.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep

Thank you, I’ve called the clinic this morning and someone is supposed to be calling me back. The girl who took my blood at the GP’s had great difficulty in getting any, she tried both arms twice, 3 times in each hand before she got any, that was in the morning, I don’t know what time it would go to the lab. At my usual phlebotomy place they get it first time, even though I have deep veins.

ainslie profile image
ainslie in reply tolizzziep

what you say about the nurse may be relevant and could possible affect the labs

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply toainslie

Thank you, nobody has phoned me back so I’ll phone them again tomorrow.

AnBee profile image
AnBee

the nurse may also have had difficulty if you were dehydrated

MCW22 profile image
MCW22

I too worry about progression to AML, Having already progressed from PV to MF. My blasts have been ever so slowly creeping up and at my last blood test were 2.48 My white count is still high at 35 HB 99 I'm taking 15mg of ruxolitinib twice a day. I had been taking one iron tablet every other day for the last 6 months but have now been told to stop them.So far I have not had any transfusions or epo injections but I expect that's only a matter of time.

I'll be following your progress with interest.

Carol.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep in reply toMCW22

We’re in the same boat, let’s hope it doesn’t capsize! The worry this disease causes is immense!

MCW22 profile image
MCW22 in reply tolizzziep

I just noticed on the bottom of my last blood report it says blood film referred to consultant haematologist for comment. It then goes on to say numerous teardrop poikilocytes, pronounced basophilia and 7% blasts. I'm assuming that the lower 2.48% blasts is in the peripheral blood and the blood film is a closer inspection hence the higher reading. It's very confusing but I do know teardrop cells are not good. I've had them before on blood tests but this is the first time it's described them as numerous. I also saw a new high reading on my liver function test. After googling and seeing it can be caused by too much iron, I came to the conclusion that must be why I was told to stop taking the iron tablets.

lizzziep profile image
lizzziep

You wouldn’t think blood could have so many aspects to it. Hope all goes well for you. 🙏🏻🤞❤️

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Some results, at last

I had some blood sent for Next Generation Sequencing back in March, I’ve been waiting for the...
lizzziep profile image

Haematology Appointment Update

I’ve seen the haematologist in person this afternoon - first time in clinic for over 3 years. It...
lizzziep profile image

Undiagnosed officially for more than 10yrs.

Hi all I’m a newby and still officially undiagnosed but to cut a loooooong story short I’ve had...
Loubee27 profile image

Understanding your blood test

Hi all, Happy New Year etc! I have finally managed to translate my blood test results and for...
Quercus53 profile image

MF transplant update - days +21 to +40

Hi All, It has been 20 days since I was discharged from the BMT unit. It has been lovely to be...
Simon96 profile image

Moderation team

Debinha profile image
DebinhaAdministrator
Mazcd profile image
MazcdPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.