Blowjobs after circumcision

[versa2508]

Anyone who's been circumcised as an adult say if blowjobs felt better after getting cut ?

[dronist]

Far better

[versa2508 in reply to dronist]

Why so mate ? What is it you feel improved ?

[Nelly19812022]

definitely better. She prefers it aswell. No cheesey cock now 😂

[versa2508 in reply to Nelly19812022]

Why so mate ? What is it you feel improved ?

[shaannsn]

hands free

[versa2508 in reply to shaannsn]

How do you mean hands free ?

[shaannsn]

no hands required to hold the foreskin down... hand can complement the head movement

[versa2508 in reply to shaannsn]

Did you feel before you had to hold the skin in a down position , while she sucked at the glans ? Do you think the exposed glans is the only part that gets feel good receptors ? If it's covered by skin your not getting anything ?

[shaannsn]

the motion is more smooth with the skin not rolling up every now and then. I think you might search many videos explaining what I mean on certain adult entertainment sites

[versa2508 in reply to shaannsn]

I've always felt my phimotic ring a bit tight.Like I've always felt I'd like it to go back n forward over the erect glans a bit easier ,and not give me any discomfort or pain.So getting a handjob I'd feel more comfy if it didn't go right back.WHAT EXACTLY YOU SUGGESTING I SEARCH ? AND WHERE YOU MEAN PORNHUB ETC ?

[shaannsn in reply to versa2508]

just see the difference between a bj given to a circumcised man as opposed to an uncircumcised. I'm done

[Momento]

Nowhere near as good without foreskin sliding up and down.

[Christopherr]

Definitely better, and my girl prefers it too. She says without the movement it feels much nicer to suck. And I feel like it feels way better, probably because your head is way more exposed during the bj. She also likes that it's hands-free now.

[pentire2]

Oral sex has taken on a whole new pleasure for both of us. I no longer have a panic about "Is my dick going to be clean enough?" and my partners have found the ready-pealed appearance very inviting.

[jaglad]

Wife has no preference, for me it felt great before. Now it one of the few things where I can say it is better than before. The feeling of her lips just below the head feels great.

[ml66uk]

I lived in America (where circumcision among men my age was very common) a long time ago, and noticed that women there are much rougher with blow jobs to the point where it might be no longer enjoyable.

Plenty of women prefer intact btw, eg Brooke Magnanti (Belle de Jour), who said:

"Indeed, so common is having the cut in American culture that I never saw a penis au naturale until I was 19 and dated - wait for it - a nice -lad from Huddersfield. Having never seen an uncut specimen in person before, well, it came as a bit of a shock.

And for all the debate both ways, I have to declare an interest here: Team Anteater all the way! Though mainly for selfish reasons…ask anyone who's given oral sex to men both cut and uncut, and most will agree uncut is less work. My hat is off to anyone who partners permanently with a man who is circumcised and finds themselves a full time member of Team Bald Eagle. For me it's all about enlightened self interest."

[versa2508 in reply to ml66uk]

What age are you ? Why do you think it's more common in USA?

[ml66uk in reply to versa2508]

I'm 57, and it's definitely a lot more common in the USA - around 85-90% of men my age were circumcised at birth, and it's still considered normal over there, though the infant circ rate is now down to around 65%.

It was originally popularised because 19th century doctors thought that :

a) masturbation caused various physical and mental problems (including epilepsy, convulsions, paralysis, tuberculosis etc), and

b) circumcision stopped masturbation.

Both of those sound ridiculous today I know, but that's how they thought back then, and that's how non-religious circumcision got started. If you don't believe me (and it seemed bogus to me at first too), then search for "A Short History of Circumcision in North America In the Physicians' Own Words" or just look for any medical text from about 1850-1950 that mentions male circumcision or masturbation. Heck, they even passed laws against "self-pollution" as it was called.

Over a hundred years later, people keep looking for new ways to defend the practice.

[versa2508 in reply to ml66uk]

Why did circumcision stop masterbation ?

[ml66uk in reply to versa2508]

It didn't, but these are some of the reasons given by doctors at the time (in the UK as well as the USA), and you'll find plenty more if you search for "A Short History of Circumcision in North America In the Physicians' Own Words":

1860: .001% of the North Eastern urban American male population circumcised

In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice being continued. For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantage; the operation, too, should not be performed under chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate.

[Athol A.W. Johnson. On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and Early Childhood. Lancet 1860;1:344-345.]

1888: 15% of the North Eastern urban American male population circumcised

A remedy [for masturbation] which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision...The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anaesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment...

[John Harvey Kellogg. Plain Facts for Old and Young. Burlington, Iowa: F. Segner & Co. 1888:295.]

1895: 15% of the North Eastern urban American male population circumcised

In all cases of masturbation circumcision is undoubtedly the physicians' closest friend and ally...To obtain the best results one must cut away enough skin and mucous membrane to rather put it on the stretch when erections come later. There must be no play in the skin after the wound has thoroughly healed, but it must fit tightly over the penis, for should there be any play the patient will be found to readily resume his practice, not begrudging the time and extra energy required to produce the orgasm. It is true, however, that the longer it takes to have an orgasm, the less frequently it will be attempted, consequently the greater the benefit gained...The younger the patient operated upon the more pronounced the benefit, though occasionally we find patients who were circumcised before puberty that require a resection of the skin, as it has grown loose and pliant after that epoch.

[E. J. Spratling. Masturbation in the Adult. Medical Record 1895;24:442-443.]

1935: 55% of the North Eastern urban American male population circumcised

I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is "against nature," but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that masturbation is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that "God knows best how to make little boys.

[R.W. Cockshut. Circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1935;2:764.]

[xsevenx in reply to ml66uk]

Fascinating. Thanks for posting this ml66uk