As many of you low-carb freaks know, it's not all about weight loss: there's a steadily-increasing mountain of research on diabetes and heart disease that points the finger of blame at excessive carbohydrate intake. There are, of course, plenty of detractors who insist that this can't possibly be true. And that's fine. Robust debate is how science proceeds. But I thought y'all might be interested in this paper, which describes treating Type 1 diabetics with a very-low-carb diet:
pediatrics.aappublications....
It's nothing new; as the paper points out, this was the standard treatment for T1 before the development of industrial-scale processes for insulin extraction from pig offal. The choice for diabetics back then was pretty stark: eat a ketogenic diet, or die. Keto was extremely effective, and this new paper shows just how effective: 97% of the study participants ended the study with blood glucose and heart-disease risk markers more-or-less in the normal range, using less exogenous insulin.
However, my absolute favourite part was this:
"Participants reported high levels of overall health and satisfaction with diabetes management but not with their professional diabetes care (Table 3), and 27% did not discuss their adherence to a VLCD with their diabetes care providers. Of those who did discuss their diet, only 49% agreed or strongly agreed that their diabetes care providers were supportive. Narrative explanations by participants for not discussing their diet included disagreement on treatment goals and approach, perceived provider disinterest or unfamiliarity with a VLCD, a desire to avoid conflicts with the provider, and (for parents) fear of being accused of child abuse. "
That's right folks, attempting to give your diabetic child a better life using evidence-based medicine under the supervision of a research physician is now the same thing as child abuse. Welcome to Airstrip One.