So was with my consultant today. Her reply to my bfn on Monday was... I can’t believe your not pregnant “ well a lot of help that was!!!!
Anyways she feels I should get this Era test done. It’s quite expensive. Anyone had it, or can anyone shed any light on what they think about it. Is it painful 😖
I’m terrified the results might come back saying I might never be able to carry a baby 😲
Consultant feels that it might give us a better idea when transfer should be!!? As maybe this might be why implantation failed on my last two fresh cycles.
However I feel it was more my lining. Last cycle just gone they transferred at 6.5mm
And to my horror when I asked what it was the transfer previous... again a fresh transfer it was a ONLY at 5.7mm !!! Can’t believe my clinic transferred both times to such a thin lining.
Hmmm I confused 🤷♀️
Written by
TeenyTiny
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
The era test looks at the receptiveness of your lining for an embryo to implant. Usually day 5 is the optimum time to transfer a blasto but a percentage of ladies have a different window. I’ve not had it personally so can’t comment on if it’s painful. I think they take a small biopsy to check. I agree with you about lining thickness though. I always thought it should be thicker than yours was. I have read on here that some clinics only care about thickness for a frozen transfer but I’m not sure why that is. Definitely worth investigating further though.
I had it done last month . As Lynnr54 said it is to determine the receptivity of your lining so you take all the meds as you would on a normal cycle and then at the exact time they would do the transfer, they take a small biopsy which gets sent off for testing. They then get a result saying if the transfer window is correct or if it needs to be moved. It is not painful, bit uncomfortable like a smear test. It is quite a new test so is doesn't have a huge body of evidence to support it. My consultant recommended it as I had a PGS normal embryo transferred, my lining was good (11mm) and I am older (44) and in some older women the window can be different. In my case it was spot on. However I'd ask more about why they transferred with such a thin lining as most clinics like your lining to be 8mm +. Until that issue is explored and corrected I would say the ERA may be a waste of money as is a last resort if there are no other obvious reasons for implantation failure. Hope that helps.
My friend has had 6 failed transfers and is about to have her 7th next week. She’s just had the ERA test done and it came back that her uterus is most receptive at 6 days past ovulation, rather than the standard 5 when they usually put the embryo back. She’s hoping this will be the answer but I guess time will tell. She said it wasn’t painful and I think it cost around £795.
Your lining does sound on the thinner side. My clinic like to see it above 7mm, preferably over 8 so I’d definitely speak with them regarding that. Wishing you lots of luck for your next transfer xxx
I am booked in to have my ERA on Monday. I had a chemical pregnancy in August and a BFN in November so my consultant suggested it for the same reasons as you x
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.