"Is a hysterectomy with removal of the ovaries really a good treatment for endometriosis? NO,it is not." Pls read to help educate yourselves

I'm just sharing this article with you all, as it never fails to amaze me how many ladies believe this common myth, and think that a hysterectomy is a treatment for endo, it really is NOT!

"Is a hysterectomy with removal of the ovaries really a good treatment for endometriosis?

NO, it is not. Hysterectomy does not treat endometriosis but will resolve any problems caused by the uterus itself. Endometriosis involves areas outside the uterus. If a patient with endometriosis also happens to have problems with her uterus (causing uterine pain) then she may find some pain relief from hysterectomy but this is not because the operation removes or resolves her endometriosis.

Removal of the ovaries can reduce the symptoms associated with endometriosis because the ovaries are the body's main source of estrogen... take away the main source of estrogen and endometriosis may well become less symptomatic or asymptomatic, although it won't make it go away (in 85% of patients removal of the ovaries resolves their endometriosis-related pain)... so you might say "wow that's a great treatment for endometriosis!"... but... removal of the ovaries is generally combined with removal of the uterus (so it's unclear how much of the pain relief is due to the low-estrogen effects on endometriosis and not on concurrent uterine pain), surgical menopause often brings about SEVERE symptoms and can result in long-term health problems (some of which could ultimately significantly shorten your lifespan) and of course robs a woman of her fertility. The toll is therefore high, especially in young patients who still want to have children. Often the option is presented to patients when the doctor is unable to remove their endometriosis (here's a good article on that: endopaedia.info/treatment21... ).

Then there are the 15% of women who don't have relief despite hysterectomy and removal of the ovaries... the ovaries are not the only source of estrogen - endometriosis itself can synthesize estrogen and so can body fat... so even without ovaries, endometriosis may continue to be symptomatic. With this in mind, removal of a healthy woman's ovaries and uterus makes little sense in treating endometriosis.... removing the disease not the reproductive organs makes far more sense, brings fewer long-term health concerns and can bring the same, if not better, relief to the patient.

The only instances when the uterus should be removed is when the patient has uterine pain that does not respond to conservative treatments and/or there is something wrong with the uterus that requires its removal (such as severe bleeding or malignancy).

The ovaries should be preserved if at all possible - sometimes if a woman has recurrent or very large endometriomas too much ovarian tissue will be lost to save the ovaries or she may decide that removal is better than having to undergo repeated surgeries. In most cases endometriomas can be removed without removing the ovary and repeated recurrence of ovarian endometriomas following excision only affects an unlucky minority of patients.

If your doctor tells you hysterectomy with removal of the ovaries is your ONLY option... stop and seek a second opinion from an endometriosis specialist. Please never go into this surgery without first being fully informed of your options - while hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy (removal of both ovaries) has its place in gynecological surgery it's a treatment option that should not be taken lightly and should only be offered to select patients. "

Written by Libby Hopton researcher @ Vital Health Institute.

At this moment in time excision surgery with an endometriosis specialist is the gold standard treatment for endo. This is available to us at the BSGE Endo centres across the UK, if you live in England it's very simple to get referred to a specialist, the rules are different in the other regions but it is still possible. Please note the level of skill does vary with the consultants at the centres, so it's wise to do your research before you decide on which one to be referred to.


Last edited by

16 Replies

  • And what is really sad, is doctors tell us this is true, well that and being pregnant will stop endo. I've heard both from several doctors. That and menopause will make it all go away.

  • I know! it's ridiculous the amount of myths about endo, many that are tragically perpetuated by doctors!

  • Thanks for the post.

    I was surprised (concerned?) that they gynae I see is not on the BSGE list, but the hospital is? Glad to have seen it.

  • Glad it was helpful! It makes no difference if the hospital is an endo centre really, it's only the consultants on the list that are the endo specialists - unless you have currently only seen one of their registrars? If you are planning on surgery (and in most other ways really...) it would be better to be under the care of a specialist. As I mentioned sadly the level of knowledge & skill seems to vary greatly between the "specialists" at the centres. It's a good idea to research and get feedback on them before you choose, if you will be going for surgery. We are not allowed to name doctors on here, but I'm in a great group on Facebook called EndoMetropolis where you can, there are lots of other groups on there where you can too.

  • Thank you for sharing this post. Brilliant timing as I am back to see my Gynae today after my hysterectomy. Yes I still have endromesostis in my pelvis and pains so it hasn't cured it, but I knew that. I am lucky that I have had my 2 children now and I am 45... who knows how I will be going forward. Trying the endo diet now and primrose oil!!

  • Hi, glad it was good timing for you, sorry to hear that you are still suffering, and the hysterectomy didn't help. If you are still really struggling with the symptoms, you should ask to be referred to a specialist at one of the BSGE centres, look into them first as I mentioned in my reply above.

  • Hi, thank you so much for posting this.

    So many doctors says a lot of things that will help get rid of Endo but in truth nothing does. Some women are very lucky after having one operation to remove Endo they are pain free. But for how long?

    I had my hystercretomy in 2011 but kept my ovaries and I still had Endo. I had yet another operation last year November to remove more Endo and adhesions. It's been a year now and I'm still having a few problems but nothing like before my operation. I'm wondering after reading this post will the Endo return.


  • Hi, pleased it was useful for you, and good to hear that things are better after your surgery.

    Excision surgery is currently the only treatment that if done properly, ie all endo is recognised and thoroughly excised can truly get rid of the disease, and has the potential to provide permanent or long term relief. Most of what people think of as endo "coming back" is either because it was never properly removed in the first place, or it was missed, true recurrence after thorough excision is the exception.

    These articles explain more:



  • Thank you for sending those links.

  • That could not have been timed better , so thank you

    my genea has been telling me for two years that I need more surgery.

    Had keyhole surgery two years ago and had a lot of endo removed and ovarian cysts also removed.

    I have been on 3 monthly zoladex Injections ever since, and while this has helped i still get a lot of pain and discomfort .

    After the first surgery I was told that my bowel and bladder were also attached but this could not be done with keyhole surgery. I was also told that the 2nd surgery would also involve a bowel surgeon and a colostomy.

    I recently saw gynea and finally agreed to the surgery including full hysterectomy because I could not see another choice.i am losing weight because I am only eating light meals so my bowel does not hurt so much.taking far too much tramadol and ibuprofen and general feel rubbish most days.

    They discussed that they don't know the potential side effects of zoladex when used for more then 6 months and suggested stopping it. I refused because they tried stopping it sfyer 6 months and i was in agony within a couple of weeks.and even now I know 2 weeks before I am due the next injection the pain increases and I end up of work. So stopping it will allow the endo to spread.

    So he sent me to see the bowel surgeon to discuss the colostomy and if this will permanant and also arranged mri scan aswell. The mri showed nothing and the bowel surgeon has contradicted everything the gynea consultant has said.

    While the gynea are adamant it will be a duel surgery with the bowel team because of what was found . The bowel team have said they do not need to be there because my bowel is not attached and I won't need a colostomy. But he also said if during the surgery they find it do need them , one of the team is always on call.

    Left feeling totally confused as to who is actually telling the truth and what I do next !

    Can't make an informed choice as they are telling me different things.

    But having read the above I at least know that the brakes are now back on and no one is going near me while I work out other choices.

    Time for 2nd opinion me thinks !

  • Hi, sorry to hear that things are so tough, but really pleased that seeing this was good timing for you, and it sounds like putting the brakes on and getting a second opinon is a very wise idea! Making informed choices is so important, as unfortunately there are a lot of consultants that their knowledge on endo is not up to date, and most general gynaecologists don't have the surgical skills needed to perform excision, and in reality very few surgeons have the skills needed to corectly tackle really severe disease.

    Are you in the UK, if so which region? and are you currently under the care of an endometriosis specialist at one of the BSGE centres? I can probably help more then, and give you better suggestions of what to do!

    Research points to endo not "spreading" as in wildly all over the place, but the lesions can deepen and invade locally over time, and more adhesions can form. Zoladex (or any of the other GnRH drugs, or hormone treatments) will do nothing for the disease itself, at best if you can tolerate them they can only help with the symptoms. As you say there is no research on the long term side effects of GnRH drugs, so it's good that your consultant is concerned about that. Are you taking add-back HRT, and getting scans to check on your bones?

    I'm curious do they also suspect you have adenomyosis? As suggesting a hysterectomy for that would be correct.

  • Hi I am in Kent UK, not under bsge centre but after last week it is on list of considerations.

    I am on tibilone as add back, no they have never done a bone scan.

    No one has ever mentioned adenomyosis so assume not.

    At moment debating three choices.

    1- allow consultant to do more keyhole surgery to see what is happening 2 years on.(this was offered at same time as full hysterectomy etc as alternative)

    2- demand referral to bsge centre.

    3- pay for a private consultation to get second opinion.

  • Hi, personally I think that either option 2 or 3 would be your best bet. It would be far better to have any surgery with an endo specialist surgeon, who would be able to perform excision and preserve your organs, depending on the severity of the endo on your bowel, it's likely the risks of needing a colostomy would be much much lower too. If you can afford a private consultation (usually up to approx £250) you could do that, then just ask to be referred back on to the NHS list at their BSGE centre for the rest of your treatment. I would definitely ask for a bone scan (just to be safe) some of the ladies who are on GnRH for longer than 6 months, do get regular ones.

  • I had a hysterectomy 2 years ago and did get some relief, but have been suffering more and more pelvic, cul de sac and rectal pain, to the point where it keeps me out of work. I feel like I'm out of options and just stuck with it.

  • Hi, please don't feel like you are stuck with it, and have to suffer. :-( If you are in the UK, have a read of my replies above re BSGE endo centres and specialists, and ask to be referred to one, they should be able to help you.

  • We do have to be careful when talking about myths. If a myth is defined as a traditional story that is not based on fact then we would have to know the facts for sure in order to determine what is a myth. Ultimately all we have to go on in terms of the pathogenesis of endo (knowledge of which ultimately determines treatment) are theories (some published in articles as evidence, some not), statistics and perhaps most importantly the experience of women themselves hidden within their personal stories. So determining what is a myth is difficult in the light of current understanding if not impossible.

    Endometriosis is now established as a highly complex multifactorial condition underpinned by abnormal immune and endocrine function (this much can be proven in laboratories) with what is thought to be complex cross-talk between these systems. What effect removal of the ovaries and the uterus has on any given woman cannot be predicted and we can only go on observation and past studies. Ultimately no one knows.

    All involved with endometriosis will agree that hysterectomy and BSO will not 'cure' existing endometriosis. In some women it will bring long term or permanent relief from pain and effectively 'resolve' their endometriosis if measured in terms of quality of life. For some women endometriosis spontaneously resolves without medical or surgical intervention. The reason for this is not known but it may be due to a change in immune/endocrine status caused perhaps by a diet or environmental change that reversed whatever it was that triggered their endometriosis before it took hold. No one can know until we know the cause(s) of endometriosis. For others endometriosis is aggressive from the outset or becomes so or persists after TAH/BSO. It cannot be determined as fact why this would be but is presumably related to how aggressive the endometriosis is in a particular woman, which then raises the question as to what constitutes aggressiveness and how and why would it vary from woman to woman.

    It has been speculated that the endo that we seem to encounter more and more in very young women that seems to become advanced and extensive quickly may be a particularly aggressive variant that has evolved. It does seem likely that as with any disease endo will adapt and evolve over the years to resist treatment and become more effective in its purpose to do harm. Ultimately it seems likely that this may depend on the efficiency with which a given woman's endo makes optimum use of available oestrogen which in turn may be determined by its ability to biosynthesise oestradiol within its own tissue as a supplementary source of oestrogen to that produced by the ovaries. This is achieved by the conversion of cholesterol to androgens that are then converted to oestradiol by the enzyme aromatase that is expressed within endometriotic cells. Interestingly aromatase is also expressed in the endometrium of women with endo and not in healthy women. Oestradiol is produced in adipose fat which is achieved by the conversion of androgens in the blood stream to oestradiol which is then available in the circulation. This oestrogen is therefore somewhat diluted and levels would generally be low except in obese women when this source of oestradiol can have an impact on endo. But in situ oestradiol biosynthesis within endometriotic cells themselves is of great significance and depends both on expression of aromatase and on the oestrogen receptor (ER) that plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and progression of endometriosis. It is reported that the biological actions of this in situ oestrogen are more potent than those expected from a comparable amount of endocrine oestrogen, possibly because in situ oestrogen acts directly on neighbouring cells with neither dilution into the circulating volume nor binding to proteins that interfere with hormonal action. A positive feedback loop has been identified indicating the continuous local formation of oestrogen and PGE2 in endometriotic stromal cells. PGE2 is the prostaglandin considered the most critical regulator in endometriosis and the major mediator of endometriosis-related pain and this seems to further indicate the importance of this mechanism of local oestrogen production in endometriosis and would seem to explain why some women fail to respond to GnRH agonists which we know to be a seriously flawed diagnostic test.

    Clearly the gold standard is excision and if it is possible to remove all endometriotic lesions then this is likely to give a woman the best chance of a resolution as it not only removes the lesions but also their ability to sustain themselves and perpetuate inflammation. This ability must clearly vary greatly between women. In my view the histopathology of all excised lesions should routinely include testing the level of aromatase and ER expression as this may give an indication of the aggressiveness of any given woman's endometriosis and give indications as to the best treatment for women whose endometriosis persists after excision.

    There remains much controversy as to the origins of the host tissue for endometriosis. Three forms have been identified - peritoneal, endometrioma and deep nodular. Of the many theories refluxed menstruation, mullerianism (transformation of tissue laid down at birth) and coelomic metaplasia (transformation of peritoneal cells into abnormal cells) remain the most reported and supported. The general consensus is that all three may co-exist (and perhaps other mechanisms) but that retrograde menstruation is still considered an important and likely source of host tissue that becomes modified into peritoneal endometriosis. This is very different from Sampson's theory that proposed a direct 'autotransplant' of endometrial tissue as opposed to modified tissue - both the endometrium and peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis have been found to be modified already with characteristics that favour implantation of menstrual debris in ways that are not exhibited in women without endometriosis. This is the subject of another discussion but at this point in time no one theory can be confirmed or ruled out and for women whose endometriosis persists after repeated excisions who continue to have periods then removal of the uterus alongside full excision remains an option that may prevent the formation of ongoing de novo peritoneal endometriosis.

You may also like...