Look at that time of 12.40 and 134.74% for that JW10 first timer at that (not ) parkrun, I am sure that is incorrect.
Difficult to believe : Look at that time of 1... - Couch to 5K
Difficult to believe
Does look a bit unbelievable
Is this not a junior running 2k?
I think she clicked on the wrong parkrun, should have been the junior. Easily done if she was using a small screen on a phone
Sorry, I'm not au fait with this - JW10 ? - 134.74%?
I do think that time is a mistake as well!
official parkrun (pr ) speak. lol
jw10=junior female 10 year old?
the % is how well you do and they work it out on your age and gender.
if you ran 100% you would be the record holder.
a good club runner would run at 65% - 70% maybe (i stand to be corrected)
i think the 10 year old has ran a junior pr which is about 2k but recorded in the normal pr results for 5k ?
JW10:Junior Women, 10, a 10 years old girl, age grading, very few runners get a age grading of over 90%, perhaps a 80 year old running sub 25 minute 5K could get that, 134%, unheard of.
Thank you! 🙂
Maybe a tracker fail or just done it on a powered scooter😂😂😂😂
Yes does look look like a mistake 😳
Kids do a 2k parkrun so I expect that’s what they’ve done.
Oops! Have you emailed Victoria parkrun about it? I'm sure they'd want to set it straight 😊😊😊
I looked up Victoria Parkrun just to see how the runners got on because I USED to live near that park when I was a child a few years ago, ha, no, it was in the 1950's when I was a child that my father took me walks around that park, I would for old times sake like to have ran a official parkrun there but it is too far to get to from where I live now.
I suppose I could email Victoria Parkrun about that wrong time of 134% age grading and time of that 10 year old.
It was a junior 2K (not) parkrun.