MRD - Flow test compared to clonoSEQ - CLL Support

CLL Support

23,253 members39,949 posts

MRD - Flow test compared to clonoSEQ

JDG45 profile image
6 Replies

I just got this result after a year of Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax on the Majic trial.

I'm currently waiting for the clonoSEQ MRD6 results. Below are the FLOW test results. Are they comparable. If so, I have a long long way to go for MRD6.

Bone marrow, flow cytometric immunophenotyping:

1. A CD5-positive, kappa light chain-restricted B-cell population is detected. MRD = 0.39%.

2 A CD5-positive, light chain-indeterminate B-cell population is detected. MRD = 0.034%.

This note was attached to the results:

This CLL MRD assay is validated to a sensitivity level of 0.002%.

Previous therapy targeting cell surface antigen(s) can interfere with this assay's performance.

Is this significant?

Thanks

JDG45

Written by
JDG45 profile image
JDG45
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
e_yu profile image
e_yu

I am in the same trial but on the V+O side, I believe the trial will use clonoSEQ MRD6 result for decision making since that's more accurate, it will only use FLOW test result if clonoSEQ fails to get something valid.

That said, based on other posts from patients in the same trial, I see no one on the A+V side reached uMRD after one year, my guess is A+V just needs more time since A is not as fast acting as O.

JDG45 profile image
JDG45 in reply toe_yu

I guess the FLOW test was part of the Majic protocal at cycle 15. I did ask ask for a FLOW test back in January.

The clonoSEQ test I had during the screening in April said the MRD would be 20ppm (1.9 cells out of 84,795).

SeymourB profile image
SeymourB in reply toJDG45

JDG45 -

The initial ClonoSEQ test is called an ID test, and serves to identify the dominant clones. It doesn't need to sequence as many cells.

Subsequent tests will sequence more than a million and as many as 2 or 3 million.

=seymour=

Wonderwoman23 profile image
Wonderwoman23

Hello JDG45,I am also in the trial on the AV arm. Although I responded very well and achieved almost 10 -5 in the marrow, I have not achieved the 10-6 in the marrow or blood that is desired in the study. I will be on the AV for another year now. Hopefully, this 2nd year will get me there. I had so many emotions surrounding this and was very disappointed. However, I am grateful that the med combination is working , and my body is responding. I agree with e_you, that the AV combo may work slower. My doctor If you look under my profile you will find my posts and everyone's kind and informative responses 🙂. I hope they bring you the comfort and enlightenment about the study and results as they did for me.

Blessings,

Wonderwoman

JDG45 profile image
JDG45 in reply toWonderwoman23

WW23: My May clonoSEQ test showed 0.4% B cells. I'm kind of disappointed but look at it this way. It came down from 97% so that is a reduction of 240X. Not too bad. Taking the targeted meds for another 40 weeks is not a big deal but feel good about beating down those cells a lot more for a longer remission. How good do I f feel? I'm riding the Pan Mass Challenge on Aug 3 and 4 from Wellesley to Provencetown. That's 165 miles in 2 days and raising funds which will go to Dana Farber, Boston Children's Hospital and the Jimmy Fund for research and to financially help those little ones with cancer. By the way not too long ago those funds went to Dr. David's research team. They were key in getting the MAJIC trial going. I know they are working on treatments for when I am at the next PFS.

Wonderwoman23 profile image
Wonderwoman23 in reply toJDG45

Love this !! Thank you for the inspiration !! I hope you continue to feel well and thank you for your contributions that help the little ones 😊

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

MRD Testing after treatment. Help!

Is this good? Have to wait until tomorrow to actually speak to someone. Peripheral blood, flow...
AuntHelen profile image

Interpretation of blood test

I found CLL club is very helpful and people are very cooperative so I decided to put my query...
Sagarcanada profile image

Results of flow

What does this mean regarding cll? PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS A. Peripheral blood, flow only: - CD5+,...
Pat351v profile image

Progress update - Pirtobrutinib triple trial for treatment naive

I finished Cycle 4 of the fixed duration Pirtobrutinib combo trial at M.D. Anderson for...
SeymourB profile image

ASH 2019: U-MRD kinetics in the CLL14 trial (V+O vs Chl+O)

In this trial, treatments were given for 12 months. Note the decreasing slope of the MRD levels...
avzuclav profile image

Moderation team

See all
Newdawn profile image
NewdawnAdministrator
Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.