I was diagnosed with Cirhossis of the liver a couple of years ago. Sometime later they said I had 'nodules' on the liver and that , ideally, they'd like to 'ablate' them using a high frequency probe. I wanted to know if they were cancerous and had a biopsy last year. The result was that they appeared to be non-cancerous, but that they could become so, in time. A routine MRI scan in January this year showed that the nodules had grown in size. The specialist still wishes to ablate or nullify them using TACE procedures, (a tiny tube is inserted into an artery and fed through to the liver and deposits tiny plastic granules in order to cut off the blood supply to the nodules).
This scares me, especially as these things have been identified as being non-cancerous. I can't see why they can't just leave them alone and continue to monitor them They seem to be obsessed that they will turn cancerous and I can't quite discover why. Is it simply down to experience gained over many years? Is there any data relating to follow ups or cancers eventually following non-interference? I can't seem to get any clear answers.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Ron