As I most probably will need an ablation in 2024 and I live in the US, I periodically check for updates on pulse field ablation. As far as I understand it seems like the FDA yesterday approved one of the devices for pulse field? If so this is great news for US folks!!
Pulse ablation device FDA approved? - Atrial Fibrillati...
Pulse ablation device FDA approved?
Yes, really good news. Hopefully will be available in the US by next year, like it is already available in the UK and Europe.
Jim
I will need to find an EP adept at doing it…maybe Dr.Natale?
The good news about PFA is that results are not as much operator dependent, as is the case with RF. That doesn't mean you want a first year resident doing their first one on you, but I think any ep at a highly ranked cardiac hospital would be fine.
Natale has his fans and detractors. He tends to do a lot more burning than the normal ep, which is why I personally didn't choose him for my first ablation although I might consider him for a follow up if needed. He also sometimes isolates/burns the LAA where he believes afib can be hiding, but that would then require an occlusion device like Watchman. Some think that's good, I'm not so sure.
Jim
Results so far here in UK seem to indicate that success is no better than other forms of ablation BUT recovery may be more swift and procedure shorter.
Here in Oz PFA becoming available. Upside is no thermal injury ie risk of atria-oesophageal fistula forming. Downside is larger cannula puncture size for groin and septum (12Fr v 14Fr). Results the same - AF to NSR success. Noting all the other variable for longevity of NSR.
My cardiologist has organised an EP in Sydney to chat to me about Pulsed Field Ablation next week just so I can get my head around it in case I need ablation down the track and to see if I should be considering now whilst the heart is in good shape rather than wait 5 years after several more AF episodes and cardioversions etc… what is your experience on PFA
Please don't get too excited. PFA is no more effective at curing AF than RF or Cryo. It is said to be a safer procedure than either but special precautions may need to be taken by the surgeon or permanent damage to critical heart structures may result. I'm talking about coronary spasms here. You may want to look into it and make sure you get an experienced surgeon to perform yours if you decide to go ahead.
That’s the system I was in the trial for that just got approval. And yes, it’s great news
massdevice.com/medtronic-pu...
That’s great you were able to participate in the trial. How was the procedure?
i was the first one getting PFA at Mayo as part of the clinical trial in 2020. Havent had any problems since!
It looks like Johns Hopkins in Baltimore MD will start doing PFAs in the spring to early summer of this year. Hugh Calkins, my EP, was part of the five-year trial and I have an appointment with him mid-March to see if I’m a good candidate. He didn’t want to do a 2nd ablation after my 2018 cryo only had moderate success - because they only do GA for ablation and I’d had a stroke. So the shorter time of procedure was a big plus. Please keep us apprised of your story, fuzzyduck!