Has anyone else tried supplementing potassium to ease arrythmias? I've had a surprising result. Sorry for long post.
Magnesium is the oft talked about one for AF or ectopics, and I added magnesium quite a while back, with a marginal though noticeable effect on damping ectopics. I recently checked my calcium intake on my GP's advice as I am off dairy due to probably a lactose intolerance, and did indeed find it low. So whilst other foods have Ca, I needed supplements too. The Ca had no effect on my arrhythmias (& not expecting any).
But along with calcium check I was able to see that my potassium intake was also low - around half of the 3.4 to 4.7 g/day (from various sources) required. My K levels in previous bloods have always been within the 3.5 - 5 required range - varying from 3.7 to 4.7. Nevertheless, I was being driven mad by ectopics, burping, wind, and rapidly varying heart rate (around a cycle of 2 to 4 seconds), all causing sleepless nights.
So I started eating bananas rigorously, also bought some decent-strength potassium citrate, 500 mg tablets, and slowly increased these, always being aware too much K is also bad for you. After a couple of weeks I felt things were improving and at present I've been on them for 5 weeks. As an AF veteran I'm used to thinking things have helped, only to be disappointed. However I am pretty sure they are helping. The ectopics are much fewer, and the heart rate variability has just about disappeared - most of the time my rhythm is now rock solid regular, and it's this change in particular which has convinced me something good is going on. The wind and burping is also less (as well as this driving ectopics, an irritable heart can make the gut worse, as I've found over the years).
Part of the reason I did this was from a hospital stay 4 years ago when my AF restarted due to an aortic dissection. The hospital said my K levels were in range, but that "we like you up the top end of the range" and gave me some horrible tasting K supplementation (sachets). So I figured maybe being at 3.7 was a bit low for me, and maybe the periods I've had fewer ectopics correspond to when I was more like 4.7.
My cardiologist listened with interest and did recommend that I get my K levels checked again to make sure I'm not too high, which I'm very happy to do. But in the meantime the fact that my arrhythmias are lessened seems to be the proof of what is needed, rather than just going by numbers.
So, I just wondered if anyone else had similar experience? The literature is full of the effect of low (sub-3.5) or very low K levels causing AF etc, but there appears not to be any work on whether the standard range is actually that much of a guide if you have a tendency to arrhythmia.