A recent biopsy revealed a Gleason 4+3 with PNI and I have scheduled focal salvage cryoablation at Duke Cancer Center on December 11. This is a recurring cancer following primary radiation 10 years ago. The doctor there, Dr Polascik, will perform the procedure and is very experienced in cryotherapy.
I had made tentative plans to travel to NY to see Dr Zelefsky for consultation on focal salvage brachytherapy on November 19, but now I’m having second thoughts about whether I should go. Here’s why:
When I made the appointment weeks ago, I did not know if I would qualify for cryotherapy at Duke. Now I know I do.
I think it's likely Dr Zelefsky will recommend ADT for a short period before and after the procedure. It's hard for me not to overstate how much I don't want to take ADT. I can’t say it’s a deal breaker for me, but it’s very, very close. It’s not needed for the cryoablation procedure.
As I noted, the biopsy at Duke reported PNI. Dr Polascik didn’t think it was particularly important but my reading says it could be. He offered full gland treatment if it worries me, but side effects are more likely. I don’t know what Dr Zelefsky will recommend for PNI, if anything. I suppose all he can do is treat the whole gland or hit me with some external radiation along the nerve path. I’ve already had primary radiation treatment and not looking for too much more. It might be pennywise and pound foolish to leave the PNI untreated through.
It’s expensive to travel to NY. $1500-2000 for air, lodging, and meals for two, for one night. How many trips might I need for the treatment and follow up? I’m fortunate in that I can afford it, but is it something that I really need to do?
I guess it comes down to this for me: how important is ADT and PNI? ADT might be the usual protocol as a combined treatment with radiation for a 4+3 , but doesn't enhance the cryotherapy effectiveness. I just don't know about PNI. I visualize cancer cells running along the nerve pathways unimpeded and that's worrisome.