Rising PSA: What are the most Accurate... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,371 members28,134 posts

Rising PSA

JolleySprings profile image
29 Replies

What are the most Accurate scans for detecting hot spots of cancer?

Husband has had several PSMA scans and CT with contrast yet nothing shows up.

He had one lymph show up in 2017 on an Auxium scan and it was radiated. 7 years later PSA rising… up to 14. Yet scans show nothing definitive.

CT with contrast showed what they described as “Unchanged” Lymph node suspicious for cancer metastasis yet not conclusive.

Does he need some other type scan? Should he proceed with radiation on “suspicious” lymph?

His and has been on Lupron for 6 years and recently and added NUBEQA about one year ago.

In one year PSA has been rising. Up to 14 now.

Dr. Aggarwal says no longer treat PSA # only scan results. Yet, CT with contrast is not definitive.

Thoughts?

Thank you!

Written by
JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
29 Replies
StayingOptimistic profile image
StayingOptimistic

may be his cancer is not psma avid and he needs an FDG scan? Just a guess

JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings in reply toStayingOptimistic

Thank you! Would a CT with contrast not show spots which are not PSMA avid??

StayingOptimistic profile image
StayingOptimistic in reply toJolleySprings

Good question. I thought about it but unfortunately I do no know the answer.

God_Loves_Me profile image
God_Loves_Me

super scan may be jnm.snmjournals.org/content...

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply toGod_Loves_Me

What interpretation did you draw from that?

I was struggling to relate it to the post.

God_Loves_Me profile image
God_Loves_Me in reply todhccpa

I am addressing this line "PSMA scans and CT with contrast yet nothing shows up", i think super scan or FDG Scan will show more things

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply toGod_Loves_Me

Thanks. I've never heard of it. Do you know if it's readily available in USA? Or has another name?

God_Loves_Me profile image
God_Loves_Me in reply todhccpa

It is clinical trial and available in USA. Please chekcout nearest location and touch base with them

Here is the press release as well

ir.ambrx.com/news/news-deta...

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa in reply toGod_Loves_Me

Thanks, that clarified it.

Derf4223 profile image
Derf4223

Consulting with Dr. Google "nubeqa versus abiraterone" this came up

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

excerpt:

"Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined by rising levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) despite androgen-deprivation therapy in the absence of metastases on conventional imaging (1,2). Among nmCRPC patients, higher PSA levels and shorter PSA doubling time are associated with increased risks of metastases and mortality (3-5). Three androgen receptor inhibitors—apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide—have been developed as add-on therapy to androgen-deprivation therapy for nmCRPC since 2018. Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated their superiority to placebo in delaying PSA progression, metastasis, and death (6–8), "

JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings in reply toDerf4223

NUBEQA did not work for him. Side effects were worse than Lupron, unfortunately! Also, it did very little, and only at commencent of treatment, in bringing down his PSA.

They are planning to do targeted Radiation on this lymph node that, as report states is “suspicious for metastasis.

I’m not sure it is a good idea to radiate on “suspicions”… 🤦‍♀️

God_Loves_Me profile image
God_Loves_Me in reply toJolleySprings

Have you talked to DR about side effects ? Dr should prescribe XTANDI that can help you with side effect

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply toJolleySprings

You could ask for nano MRI to see if the lymph nodes are infected or not.

jnm.snmjournals.org/content...

Nfler profile image
Nfler in reply toDerf4223

Yes I figured it had something to do w nubeqa as the rise in psa occurred a year ago when starting nubeqa. Maybe do an fdg or super scan like mentioned above…

Maxone73 profile image
Maxone73

64Cu-SAR-bisPSMA would be the most precise, but maybe at the moment he would have to be enrolled in a trial to use it

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981

my dad has same thing his scans show stable every three months psa goes up to 10 now - the dr said sometimes he sees this - so they monitor him very closely

JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings in reply toChris52981

Ugh! I hate that! I want to know where it is in hopes of radiating it!!! 😩

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply toJolleySprings

Ask for nano MRI to see if the lymph nodes are infected or not.

jnm.snmjournals.org/content...

Chris52981 profile image
Chris52981

can we just radiate it rather than going on new meds

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI

Would be interesting if you share blood biopsy results. Your bio suggests to me you have an excellent multi-disciplinary team. Dr Kwon of Mayo has informative YouTube discussion about different types imaging. Six years ago I went to Europe for Ferrotran nanoparticle MRI with PSMA for comparison. At usPSA 0.1 nanoMRI identified five suspicious pelvic nodes whereas the PSMA was clear. Cancer was confirmed by salvage pelvic lymph node surgery; so at least in my case the nanoMRI was better.

JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings in reply toNanoMRI

His blood biopsy result was he has CDK12 mutation. He recently had FRACTIONATED Blood biopsy from which I understand it will specify percentages of the load of mutation. Not sure it will change treatment plan whatever the result is.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

For non-metastatic CRPC, Erleada, Xtandi or Nubeqa are indicated.

JolleySprings profile image
JolleySprings

Dr. Aggarwal has ordered To add Zytiga to his Lupron. NUBEQA did not work for him. 😩

Retireddoc profile image
Retireddoc

PSMA PET is the most sensitive/specific Imaging test available.

treedown profile image
treedown

I am in a similar boat though it seems you husband is CRPC and I am not yet. I am in that scan and see part of treatment as well. If he is not is pain that also makes it harder for a Dr to trace mets. However, if there is no pain as with me I am just going to enjoy this time as best I can. I went a year between recurrence and new scans. Now they want them again in 3 months. I feel good and PSA is low but for some reason they are concerned the cancer has morphed to a low psa version. Not sure why. I asked my Dr if I am just waiting to become CRPC and he said yes. After watching the posted video by Dr Scholz I am/was thinking about consulting with him ot somebody like him. Your Dr is top of the heep and has me rethinking it if any value in a another opinion.Thanks

RoseDoc profile image
RoseDoc

Consider consulting Dr. Kwon at Mayo. He does a Choline PET there. He claims lesions show on that scan that PSMA PET scan won’t show. If PSA is rising, you have metastatic disease

dhccpa profile image
dhccpa

Great question. I recently had a somewhat similar experience.

God_Loves_Me profile image
God_Loves_Me

Following two clinical trial may work really good base on your post and bio

clinicaltrials.gov/study/NC...

clinicaltrials.gov/study/NC...

jazj profile image
jazj

Can anyone actually point to any scientific articles that actually document an imaging modality that detected lesions where 68Ga PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL PSMA CT scans didn't as I've never seen one myself. Of those two, [18F]DCFPyL is supposedly slightly superior and outside a clinical trial I would assume is the most accurate you can currently get. (Sorry can't remember the study where they did a comparison between the two.)

Seems like there can always be an "exception to the rule" though but you would think it would be documented in scientific literature somewhere based on occurrences with multiple patients out of the millions of PCa patients since PSMA CT scans started to be used.

The other possibility that hasn't been mentioned here is incompetence (or more politely put as an error) in administering and/or analyzing his scan results. What might be described as "suspect" may be positive for cancer and responsible for the vast majority of his PSA level. This to me seems like the most plausible explanation. If it's not human error, tell them to fix their machine (joking, sort of.)

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Rising PSA

Year 7… No prostate. Clear everything in 2017 … but 6 months after surgery rising PSA....
JolleySprings profile image

6 weeks after radiation my PSA is still rising

I finished 33 sessions of IMRT on 3 lymph nodes (the only 3 places where the new PET scan specific...
EdMiller profile image

Apalutamide and rising PSA

Hey Gents, Been fighting this motha close to 15 years. When I became castration resistant, I...
MJCA profile image

Rising PSA -

Diagnosed: May 2021 age 53 otherwise no health issues. Only symptom was increased urination that...
MPCSUX profile image

rising psa but scans are clear

I had brachytherapy 6 years ago for prostate cancer, Gleason score 6. PSA went down to under 1. Now...
planetman profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.