After MRI/biopsy was recommended AS for G7 in Jan 2020 and PSA 4.1, which stayed stable until mid 2021 - I opted for HIFU for in Decembers 2021 when my PSA reached 6 then 8. However it failed as PSA return to 6 by July 2022. Another MRI and biopsy surprises urologist aa reveals G9. Had PSMA which was Clear - and initially treated with 8 weeks of Bicalutimide and then Zoladex plus RT 20 x 3Gy (no pelvic RT).
3 months post RT and 5.5 months into Zoladex PSA 0.01 and testosterone 0.6
I am assuming this is a good result so far ? And curious as to know if the HT merely keeps the PCa hormone sensitive cells in check (until the hormone resisted cells may eventually take over) or has it a more overall destructive mechanism with the 18-24 months standard protocol for intermediate to high risk. Equally, surely a very low testosterone level must have some relevance to treatment outcomes and so curious why not routinely requested with the PSA.
Of course I am at this stage happy to have a relatively quick response to a nadir of 0.01 - 12 weeks post RT and 5.5 months on Zoladex.
I am just trying to understand the future risks profile and process. - is it too early to offer an indication that the oncologist choice to not include pelvic radiation due to clear PSMA (due partly also because of comorbidities) was a reasonable risk call as we know the PSMA doesn’t see micro mets.