EMBARK trial results already available? - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,364 members28,125 posts

EMBARK trial results already available?

GP24 profile image
GP24
12 Replies

EMBARK is a randomized Phase 3 study of enzalutamide plus leuprolide, enzalutamide monotherapy, and leuprolide alone in men with high-risk non-metastatic HSPC.

Pfizer announced: "the estimated primary completion date for the EMBARK clinical trial is mid-2020" pfizer.com/news/press-relea...

Did Pfizer publish any results of this trial yet? The trial includes an Enzalutamide monotherapy arm. I am very interested in these results.

Written by
GP24 profile image
GP24
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
12 Replies
cesces profile image
cesces

What do they expect to be special with:

enzalutamide plus leuprolide?

GP24 profile image
GP24 in reply tocesces

This article reports: "To date, there is no approved therapy for patients who have PSA relapse after surgery and/or radiotherapy and are at high risk for metastatic disease. Androgen deprivation is the de facto standard and most commonly prescribed treatment in this setting. The EMBARK trial is designed to address this unmet need in high-risk, nonmetastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients who recur after primary therapy." annalsofoncology.org/articl...

They hope the combination will cause metastases to occur later than with lupron alone. However, I am more interested in the monotherapy, testosterone will not be lowered then.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

As of April 2020, EMBARK (Xtandi for high-risk recurrent non-mPC) has a primary completion date of September 15, 2023

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

ARCHES (Xtandi for mHSPC) was published several years ago:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

GP24 profile image
GP24 in reply toTall_Allen

Pfizer amended the trial to be able to get primary endpoint results in mid 2020:

"The main purpose of the amendment is to revise the planned analyses of the primary and several secondary endpoints, which reduced the target sample size. Enrollment was completed earlier this year [2018]. With these changes, the estimated primary completion date for the EMBARK clinical trial is mid-2020. Previously, the expected primary completion date for EMBARK was March 2021."

pfizer.com/news/press-relea...

Therefore I asked whether anything was published yet or if there was an announcement that results will be presented at a conference soon.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toGP24

Your info is out of date. In April of 2020, Pfizer amended the primary completion date to 2023.

GP24 profile image
GP24 in reply toTall_Allen

You are correct, thank you. They just moved it from 2020 to 2023.

joeguy profile image
joeguy

I asked my Uro about Xtandi as a monotherapy (I was on it with Firmagon injections), and he said without the injections the Xtandi would cause you to grow quite the rack....... he made it sound above and beyond man boobs, like maybe a C or D cup or something crazy....... Im not sure I believe him

GP24 profile image
GP24 in reply tojoeguy

I would take tamoxifen to avoid breast enlargement. Yes, otherwise the breasts will grow.

joeguy profile image
joeguy in reply toGP24

I think I heard there may be clotting issues with tamoxifin....... thats a big no-no for me

GP24 profile image
GP24 in reply tojoeguy

I took it with Bicalutamide and observed no side effects from it.

noahware profile image
noahware in reply tojoeguy

I think that is wise, with indications that COVID may be, in part, more problematic in people prone to clotting. I have just decided to discontinue it. The risk alone, without the added risk of COVID, was acceptable to me, being that asymptomatic PC is my only comorbidity.

I read recently that lung issues with many COVID patients were likely a matter of excessive thickening/clotting of blood. The virus seems to promote clotting. At least through this winter, I plan on doing things (whether by addition or subtraction) that might reduce my clotting risks.

MateoBeach profile image
MateoBeach

Have to presume that they originally hoped to show increased PFS ( to CR) with the combo at 2 years but did not get it. So they extended it to 5 years in the hope of seeing better PFS and OS by that time vs ADT alone. Would be worth a boatload of money for Pfizer. Must assume no statistically significant difference at two years, otherwise they would report it.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

EMBARK trial results reported

Pfizer reported results of the EMBARK trial testing Xtandi+Lupron or Xtandi alone against...
GP24 profile image

EMBARK Study: ADT vs Enzalutamide +/- ADT

Results of the EMBARK study was published this week (10/19/23) in NEJM. It compared high risk BCR...
MateoBeach profile image

Xtandi monotherapy is very effective

(Zoom your browser to read the image) At the AUA2023 the results of the EMBARK trial were...
GP24 profile image

Enzalutamide/Xtandi monotherapy as ADT with fewer side effects than Lupron

Enzalutamide monotherapy can improve the quality of live for advanced prostate cancer patients....
GP24 profile image

Xtandi (enzalutamide) alone is superior to ADT alone at preventing metastases in "high-risk" recurrent men

"High-Risk"recurrence was defined as men who have had primary therapy (prostatectomy or radiation)...
Tall_Allen profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.