A Urologists Personal View Of PCa - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

20,785 members25,891 posts

A Urologists Personal View Of PCa

gusgold profile image
20 Replies

I have read numerous posts by guys who knew Dr. Myers when Myers was receiving treatment for PCa at the same time and by the same Doc they were. Myers is in a durable remission while there other guys are cold stone dead. Why..because Myers had the knowledge to demand and receive twice the normal radiation dose to the prostate and lymph nodes.

Now we have this Uro..because of his knowledge and "friends" in the business he was able to chart out the optimum treatment What about us "mere mortals"...we make an appointment to see some sanctimonious smuck, in a white coat, and put our life in his hands..many times to our own detriment.

It is only by being members of this great group that we can find out the best treatment. But, for most of us this is after the fact. When we first got that rising PSA and then the biopsy of PCa we were scared and just wanted the damn thing out of our bodies and were flying blind. Nobody told me it was usually a slow growing cancer and I had plenty of time to do research and educate myself. No way...I was rushed into a RP and then that worthless SRP. And when I had a BCR after SRP they wanted to rush me into ADT and put me on the path to CRPC. But, I knew enough by then to say Fuck You.

Gus

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

Written by
gusgold profile image
gusgold
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
20 Replies

Yea, it seems super easy to be critical of the careless care that one seems to get. Bungling allover the place. I dont think that they realize how it looks from the patient's end. And the "satisfaction surveys" they send out are hopeless. IMHO.

He says his Gleason was 4+4 with a little 5. Now, after the 2014 revision, that would be 4+5. Ignoring the presence of any 5 is no longer thought to be the most accurate characterization of the danger of the disease.

He mentions adjuvant radiation, but on rereading the sentences, I gather he did not get that; it was a comment reflecting what the thinking became.

Then in 2012, he was using a T99 scan to look for and find bone mets. This seems so short of ideal.

He did simultaneous enza and abi? I thought there was a conflict there someplace. I forget what...

Survived ugly. Good for him.

Thanks for posting the article. Stuff to ponder.

bldn10 profile image
bldn10 in reply to

I believe that Myers in fact hit his w/ everything available at the time except RP, including protracted ADT.

Yea, tell a rad-onc how much radiation you want, or almost anything that doesn't fit their standard protocol, and you will either relent or be sent packing.

pjoshea13 profile image
pjoshea13 in reply to bldn10

I only met Myers once. He did not look well at all, but he said that he was coming up to 5 years since treatment & was excited by that.

He told me that he had almost every lymph node in his body removed, & that "They wouldn't do that today."

Gus mentions him being an insider when diagnosed, but wasn't he a researcher at UVA back then? Connected, of course, but not treating patients?

-Patrick

mooseheadlodge profile image
mooseheadlodge

Thanks Gus, excellent post! I bookmarked that link.

woodpecker43 profile image
woodpecker43

Thanks Gus. I find my case following the same path this guy took. I am waiting for approval to do SBRT to oligo mets. (two, one in lymph node and one in hip bone) Surgery and srt have failed. Hoping for a durable remission.

in reply to woodpecker43

I dont see why they will do salvage radiotherapy on people who have gone metastatic after radiotherapy to the primary, but get all squeemish about doing radiotherapy to people who present as metastatic.

herb1 profile image
herb1

Beautiful article. I'm going to write Dr. S a thank you (and more) note. My conclusion, again: I shuda got an MD instead of the Ph.D. Maybe then these guys wudda listened!

Herb s.

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

Herb, like you I have a Ph.D. and it helps. My doctors will listen. In the past, I had a doctor who is no longer on my medical team; who said I read too much. However, on my next visit he adopted the protocol I previously mentioned.

Rich

herb1 profile image
herb1 in reply to BigRich

maybe I'm just not as nice to my docs as you are :-) I do challenge.

herb

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

Herb, I believe, when neccessary, it is my duty to challenge.

Rich

herb1 profile image
herb1 in reply to BigRich

Rich, what would you counsel me to do: Just reviewed my CTs and bone scans over ~14 yrs. I find that the ordering doc, my oncologist, ordered 5 out of 6 of these when my psa was <<1 while on ADT3? A waste, at the least!

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

Did you have mets before you went on ADT? Where? Size in millimeters or centimeters? Number of mets?

Rich

herb1 profile image
herb1 in reply to BigRich

Rich, yes, "we" believe so. 2+yrs after seeds+XBRT, psa at 9.0, A "suspicious 2.5 mm" right external iliac node observed on CT but was confused by a prostascint (remember?) that showed the node "did not persist" on the fifth day rescan. I understood that that 5th day was critical. Answer your Q?

herb

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

In 14 years you had only 6 scans?

Was your PSA always under 1 0r .1

Rich

herb1 profile image
herb1 in reply to BigRich

Rich, yes, on IADT-3, i'm at psa <<1 for most of the time; until things go to hell each cycle. That's when I should have had scans, but it hasn't been that way and I'm pissed.

Please don't suggest change oncologists-that could be from fireplace into fire! And, yes, I've been to top doc in NYC-very disappointed.

herb

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

Herb, as you know, there is a difference between a PSA of 1 and a PSA of .1

Let me give you an example a man has back pain and a PSA 0.02 ng/ml and scans shows mets in lymph nodes, bone, and liver.

I don't think a yearly scan is a waste , and if there were 6 scans in 14 years, I don't think you got over scaned.

Rich

herb1 profile image
herb1 in reply to BigRich

Rich, I don't agree; the scans would have been much more useful if they had been targeted for when my psa peaked. That would have been 3 scans. I'll even give you a first scan at low psa for the extreme case you note, but when that was negative, why do it again. What did Einstein say? "hoping to get a different result is fruitless". You're ignoring the exposure in those Cts and bone scans. And TOTALLY IGNORING the emotional effects.

For the record, I had scans at psa's at/near 0.04, 0.82, 2.04, 0.37, 0.24, 0.13, 0.81, 0.1, 0.3, some on ADT3, some off.

herb

BigRich profile image
BigRich in reply to herb1

Herb,

I wish you well.

Rich

paulofaus profile image
paulofaus

Awesome post Gus, this is great information. All newly diagnosed guys should be reading this.

You may also like...

The Story of Two Guys with PCa or Why If You Get PCa It pays To Be a Urologist

These 2 guys had PCa around the same time but their treatments differed..The URO is doing just fine.

After being Dx PCa Metastasis, any reason to regularly see an Urologist?

5, my pelvis MRI looked like scrambled eggs when PCa diagnosed (Dx) with PSA 1000+, your office...

My Dad died... but not from PCa

coiling of the burst vessel. He died with his PCa in durable remission, with a PSA score of <0.006...

Interpretation - Stable or Growing PCA?

that because his PSA is still decreasing on hormone treatment it is unlikely that the PCA would be...

Is there any validity to this concept—reducing the pressure on Pca via drug treatment?

com/story/cancer-treatment-darwin-evolution/ Dr Myers’ operating hypothesis, developed towards the...