Hello everyone. I found this forum and it looks like it could be of real help.
4 years ago my wife was diagnosed with an AN and, following 6-8 months of monitoring, was given radiotherapy (at Addenbrookes) to treat it.
To cut a very long story short, she has suffered distessing symptoms ever since. She was told that the tumour was "stable" after follow ups despite the fact that there was still some growth. I suppose that there is a margin they work within to determine whether it is stable or not..........
Last week she was advised that surgery will be the best course of action but it is not urgent. The specialist believes that the tumour will continue to grow slowly and advised the surgery is done soon in order to alleviate the symptoms she suffers from. He believes this will improve her quality of life.
I am absolutely determined that she has the very best surgeon to do this, wherever he or she may be. We will find the money to do it. I have read research which states there is a clear correlation between a successful operation and the number of times the surgeon has carried out the procedure. This is logical but the research is proof it is true.
So, my VERY big question is who is the right person. I keep seeing Queen's Square appear as a centre of excellence but, if so, who would be the best surgeon to see for a tumour which has already had radiotherapy.
Is there another centre / surgeon within the UK or abroad we should be considering?
Any advice anyone can give would be hugely appreciated. THANK YOU!!