Post surgery PSA Test: Hey Fellas, I am... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,258 members3,325 posts

Post surgery PSA Test

Dreamweaverman profile image
22 Replies

Hey Fellas, I am reaching out because I just got my PSA test results back. I am going to schedule meeting with the primary doctor but was wondering if any of you knew what my PSA level should be if cancer free? My PSA, TOTAL is 0.7 ng/mL, In your experiences is this normal, has anyone ever done more treatment with this level? Thanks again for all the support.

Written by
Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
22 Replies
Roger2Dodger profile image
Roger2Dodger

I just recieved my PSA results from my oncologist. After 18 months post EBRT.

Mine was 0.414...Doctor Said that was excellent. My first reading after 6 months was 0.814.

BTW... with your score why would you think more treatment??

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman in reply toRoger2Dodger

Hey Roger, Thanks for the reply. I am just being thorough as I wish I had found this site months before I had actual surgery. I feel good, but I know some people did hormone therapy after surgery. thanks for feedback

Bcgkelly profile image
Bcgkelly

In my experience it’s best to discuss with the doctor as I was told there were five different PSA tests provided by different companies and that depending on which Laboratory you had it done what was considered acceptable would be different. That’s the case in Ireland anyway. My consultant advised me that I wouldn’t be getting radium treatment until at least six months after surgery but that if necessary I might be put on hormone treatment before that. Mine was 0.035 at three months and I’m having the six month PSA test tomorrow. It would appear if it’s not on the increase it’s okay for now and if it is increasing further treatment is required. Do let me know how you get on. Bill

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman in reply toBcgkelly

Thanks so much Bill, Will do

Bcgkelly profile image
Bcgkelly in reply toDreamweaverman

Your welcome, sending you positive thoughts and best wishes.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

No, that is definitely not normal - they call that "persistent." You should definitely be discussing salvage radiation with a radiation oncologist.

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman in reply toTall_Allen

Hi Allen, Thanks so much for your feedback. I have contacted my urologist who seems to think it’s a bit early to tell. However I want to veer on the side of caution and speak with a radiation oncologist. I also thought I should be closer to zero by now. Perhaps I should take PSA test again as well.

DanWinters profile image
DanWinters in reply toDreamweaverman

I believe 0.1 is usually where you would want further evaluation to take place. .08 is considered undetectable and just continue routine follow up

Jeff85705 profile image
Jeff85705 in reply toDanWinters

Some labs, such as Labcorp in the US, don't break down beyond tenths. So my results are always (so far) <0.1 ng/ml, or "undetectable." I think the reason is to account for range of error.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply toDreamweaverman

I don't remember how "high risk" your tumor was pre-op. Yeah, I was told that if you have a competent surgeon there should be NO normal prostate tissue remaining--which means any residual PSA needs to be investigated. But there are all kinds of variables--like how any intent at "nerve-sparing" led to residual tissue. And yes, there are all kinds of PSA assays--I see lots of the guys here are getting very high-sensitivity tests that read down to 0.003 ng/ml. For reference, last week I got my six-week post-surgical PSA, and it was read as <0.05, which i take to mean it was undetectable, but on a test that wasn't particularly high-sensitivity. I had what was considered "intermediate risk" disease.

klancaster profile image
klancaster in reply toDreamweaverman

Mine was .08 after three months, which concerned my urologist. It indicates that they did not get all of the cancer, and sure enough, my PSA went to 0.18 in three months. I had salvage radiation and it is now < .1 (different doc, so the labs are less granular). For the latter test, < .1 is considered undetectable. What they actually look at is the trend, not the absolute numbers, so it will depend on what the tests look like over the next few months. One word of caution: the literature on PSA and recurrance seems to indicate that it is most effective to have salvage radiation when the psa is 0.2. It gets less effective in the long term if you wait longer.

EDIT: I just realized you said 0.7, not 0.07. You should, as others have said, look at salvage radiation as 0.7 is too high. You might also ask about hormone therapy using lupron in conjunction with the radiation. Lupron is not fun - knocks your testosterone to 0. That is standard practice at M.D. Anderson where I had my radiation, and it has been proven to enhance the chances of the radiation getting it all.

AlanMeyer profile image
AlanMeyerModerator

I agree with Tall_Allen. PSA after surgery should be very near zero. Radiation is different. It doesn't kill the cancer right away but damages it and it dies over time. But surgery, when it's successful, gets all the cancer out and should leave no prostate tissue behind to produce PSA. I seem to remember that after surgery PSA should go down within a few weeks to < .03 ng/ml - though it's possible I've got that wrong.

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman

Thanks for feedback. I am in agreement

Jeff85705 profile image
Jeff85705

My understanding would be that, depending on the kind of PSA test you took, anything less than 0.10 ng/nl is considered undetectable (that is, no test can be perfect, so that number equates to zero). 0.7 sounds like detectable, but you don't state what initial treatment you received. Surgery? Radiation? Please be more specific.

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman in reply toJeff85705

Hi Jeff, The initial treatment I received was surgery. thanks again for feedback

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Your urologist does not have a clue. Why would he? - he NEVER treats anyone with recurrent/persistent PSA. His job was over after surgery, except for actual urological issues. Even so, I can't imagine that any competent urologist wouldn't refer you immediately to an RO with a persistent PSA of 0.7. It is NOT normal, and it is already WAY too high. Michael Zelefsky at MSKCC would be my top choice in the NYC area. Do this quickly!

Your first step should be an Axumin scan, which will rule out distant metastases hopefully. if it is negative. He will probably start you on hormone therapy and follow-up two months later with salvage radiation to the prostate bed and the pelvic lymph nodes.

Dreamweaverman profile image
Dreamweaverman in reply toTall_Allen

Im on it! Thank you so much Allen

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply toTall_Allen

I wouldn't be so harsh. After all, he JUST got the result. Maybe he should have gotten the result from his urologist, but last week I didn't--they cancelled my 6-week followup appointment at MSKCC after I had been waiting for the doctor for an hour after having my blood drawn. Then the result went up on the patient portal. Had it not been good, I would have been hopping mad. But then they might have called me first--I guess there's no way to tell. Not necessarily ideal handling of a nervous patient's anxiety, but overall my family's experience there has been more comforting.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply todentaltwin

"I have contacted my urologist who seems to think it’s a bit early to tell. " 0.7 at 3 months post surgery, or even 6 weeks, is not too early to tell.

dentaltwin profile image
dentaltwin in reply toTall_Allen

Probably not. Still, as you and I know, tests sometimes screw up. So the referral is in order, but so is a repeat PSA. Yes, I've heard that random assays may differ up to 30%, which means he still gets the referral.

Jeff85705 profile image
Jeff85705 in reply todentaltwin

Not harsh, just direct. We're not playing around here. PC is a serious issue, and 0.7 PSA after surgery is cause for further investigation and treatment. Tall_Allen is doing due diligence. After prostatectomy, PSA should be at undetectable levels and continue that way. Increase to 0.2 is considered chemical recurrence. If my urologist received that PSA, he would have been on the phone to me right away. I disagree when Tall_Allen says why would the urologist have a clue? He is a surgeon, etc. That is irrelevant. The uro should be contacting him with suggestions for referral for further treatment.

EaNa profile image
EaNa

Hi. I'm just reading your post, I guess 4 years after it was posted, and wondering if you have further updates on it. I hope you followed the advice here and consulted with an oncologist.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Psa still showing post surgery.

Hi Guys Feels like I’m joining a dating app. (Although I’ve no idea what that’s like) On my wife’s...
Davick profile image

12-year post surgery PSA

Hi All, Hard to believe that it’s been 12 years since my prostatectomy. So many health issues...
jeff1257 profile image

Rising PSA levels after surgery

I had protrate surgery 15 months ago, complete removal of the prostrate. I am doing well, but my...
jdfamily profile image

High PSA after surgery

RP was march 23rd. Testosterone level mid May was 38. (not chemically induced). PSA on June 2nd...

post PSA persistent PSA

Hi. I've been following the forum in behalf of my dad since June and wondering your thoughts. He...
k538 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.