Hi everyone, I have my Haematologist telephone appointment tomorrow so just looking for a few opinions beforehand from you lovely lot…
A quick recap…. I am yet to be diagnosed as having ET. I have platelet counts mainly in the 500’s (lowest 364, highest 622 but that was with an infection). I have no symptoms and have tested negative for the three main drivers. My other bloods are all normal with the exception of Eosinophils which are always slightly raised. Iron normal but ferritin was low (currently on iron supplements). I have a history of allergies, irritable bowel syndrome and spondylosis. I’ve had an endoscopy and colonoscopy, both came back normal albeit minor GERD (acid reflux).
I understand that my current situation could now fit in within 3 categories…..
1. I could still have ET but as I’m triple negative this could only now be confirmed via a BMB.
2. If the BMB was to be normal I could potentially have a reactive cause that hasn’t yet been found / diagnosed, or my currently ailments of allergies, irritable bowel syndrome, spondylosis could be the said causes for reactive?
3. If the BMB was to be normal and no reactive causes found or current ailments believed to be the reactive causes then I would fit into the bracket of “this is just normal for me”.
So I have a few questions to ask you all although I will of course also be asking my Haematologist (I’m just keen to also hear your views)…..
With regards to reactive causes…. Although I’ve had lots of bloods done and an endoscopy, colonoscopy, I have not been sent for a scan on my spleen. I’ve also read that it may be wise to get checked for lungs, breast and ovaries…. Should this be a normal part of the investigation or is it only normal to be checked for these if bloods or other anomalies cause the suspicion to warrant further tests? I don’t know whether I should be pushing for these tests to be done or not?
With regards to no causes being found and in a case of “normal for you” where does that leave you if you still have higher than normal platelet counts? Would you still need to be on aspirin just for the fact that platelets are slightly high? Could you potentially be facing the same treatment (ie Hydroxy) as an ET patient even without ET purely through just having high platelets going forwards?
I am of course aware that I could still have ET and be a triple negative patient and am currently struggling with the decision on whether to have a BMB or not at this stage…
The way I’m looking at it is that I have no symptoms, my platelet counts are relatively low in the grand scheme of things and I am negative for the drivers. I believe I am currently “low risk”. If I have it done and do have ET I will be monitored only maybe with aspirin at this stage, and if I don’t have it done the outcome will be exactly the same, I will still just be monitored. So basically I am struggling to want to put myself through the procedure (as I do worry about the risks involved) with the outcome being the same?
Of course I do know that it would give me a definite answer which is the only positive I can see from it at the moment…..
Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated as usual! Many thanks x