Hydroxyurea or not?: Hi everyone. I have been... - MPN Voice

MPN Voice

10,874 members15,189 posts

Hydroxyurea or not?

falconered53 profile image
23 Replies

Hi everyone. I have been reading your posts for several months and need to introduce myself. I was diagnosed with PV Jak2 at age 65 and am now 73. Platelets high also. My treatments have been aspirin and phlebotomy every eight weeks if hematocrit is above 42 which it always is. Symptoms began about 2 years ago: heavy painful legs with bone pain and tingling feet, some fatigue, brain fog and frequent shortness of breath. Although my hematologist suggested taking Hydra many times, he didn’t push it and I refused as I feared side effects and thought I was pretty stable with treatments as is. But I moved recently and new heme is awesome and lovely. She has convinced me I need the medication as I am at high risk for thrombotic event at my age. I certainly would like to cut risk of stroke. But I still hesitate a bit because I want to get the new shingles vaccine (a two shot process over 6 months) which is largely unavailable right now.

Despite symptoms I’ve been leading a very active and fulfilling life. Hate to change that. I’ve read on this forum that many of you struggle with taking this chemo treatment.

So I’m open to hear your advice or experience or comments. Thanks so much.

Written by
falconered53 profile image
falconered53
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
23 Replies
WileyFrench profile image
WileyFrench

In Canada the new shingles vaccine (Shingrix) is not a live vaccine so we can get it, just like the flu shot, even if we’re taking HU. But I think that perhaps it’s a different vaccine still in the UK if that’s where you are.

falconered53 profile image
falconered53 in reply toWileyFrench

Thanks for the info. I am in US And I thought the new vaccine was live. Glad to hear I can get it

ccsial profile image
ccsial

I would give it a try. You just have to see how it works for you. We are all different. I have been on it for 14 years with no real side effects until I transformed to MF Now on Jakafi. I'm 74 now.

falconered53 profile image
falconered53 in reply toccsial

Good luck to you with your MF. and thanks for the encouragement. I probably will try it now.

Kelly2 profile image
Kelly2 in reply toccsial

Hi. I have a question. If although taking hydro one cannot avoid the MF what is the use of this treatment and not just take aspirin? Naive maybe but still.

falconered53 profile image
falconered53 in reply toKelly2

In my case I needed to bring down platelet count as well as get more time between phlebotomies to try to build up my ferritin a bit and be less exhausted all the time. It has really worked for the platelets and I am beginning to go a third month between phlebotomies instead of every 8 weeks.

Ebot profile image
Ebot

Having resisted drug treatment for a long time my platelets hit 1700 and I was being regularly venesected. At that point it was a no brainer to start Hydroxy. My counts tumbled I felt a new person. The Monster turned out to be a Miracle Worker. Current evidence suggests that venesecting long term is not best practice - someone posted a link to the research very recently. All the best.

MCW22 profile image
MCW22

I've been on it about 18 months. Nausea for the first few weeks then it settled down and now most counts are within normal range.

Carol

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8

Hey there... :-)

HU is an interesting drug that seems to work really well with some and not so with others...

At first, three years ago, I tried it and found it intolerable, in my case...

While I know of many others here on MPN Voice who would swear by it as being a godsend...

I guess that we are all a tad different, and sometimes, if we are lucky our fears do not materialise.

Personally, I have also had two (2) TIAs, and I do not recommend that experience if it can be avoided...

Best wishes

Steven

(Sydney)

hybiscus profile image
hybiscus in reply tosocrates_8

Sorry, what’s TIAS?

socrates_8 profile image
socrates_8 in reply tohybiscus

Hey Hybiscus...

No need to be sorry at all...

Transient Ischemic Attack, (TIA)

"Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a transient episode of neurologic dysfunction caused due to loss of blood flow to

the brain or spinal cord without acute infarction. Depending on the area of the brain involved, symptoms of TIA

vary widely from patient to patient. Since the blockage period in TIA is very shortlived,

there is no permanent

damage. Risk factors for TIA include family history of stroke or TIA, age above 55 years or older, higher risk of TIA

in males than females, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco smoking. Genetics, race, and

imbalance in lipid profile are other risk factors of TIA. TIA is usually diagnosed after taking a thorough history and a

physical examination. Several radiological tests such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

are useful in the evaluation of patients who have had a TIA. Ultrasound of the neck and an echocardiogram of the

heart are other tests useful in the diagnosis and evaluation of the attack. The treatment following acute recovery

from a TIA depends on the underlying cause. Patients who have more than 70% stenosis of the carotid artery,

removal of atherosclerotic plaque is usually done by carotid endarterectomy surgery. Onethird

of the people with

TIA can later have recurrent TIAs and onethird

can have a stroke because of permanent nerve cell loss. Having a

TIA is a risk factor for eventually having a stroke. Educating the patients and inculcating lifestyle modifications in

them are initial steps to minimize the prevalence of transient ischemic attack."

Reference:

Risk factors of transient ischemic attack: An overview.

Supreet Khare

Journal of Midlife

Health. 7.1 (JanuaryMarch

2016): p2.

Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2016 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.

jmidlifehealth.org/

Hope this helps...

Steven

hunter5582 profile image
hunter5582

As you can see from the varied responses, the real answer re. HU is that it depends on how you respond to it. We are each different in how our MPN presents and each respond differently to the various chemotherapies. Many docs are most familiar with HU and it is the cheapest of the various meds available (some insurance companies may require you to try it first). It is very important to understand how HU (or any drug) works and what the risks and benefits are. Like many chemotherapy drugs, HU is a toxin. It is cytostatic - it interferes with DNA activity. It reduces hematopoiesis (production of blood cells), which is its benefit for treating MPNs. However, it interferes with all DNA activity in the body. HU can break allele strands and interfere with the DNA self-repair function at a cellular level. It is teratogenic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, and possibly leukemogenic (note the latter is controversial/inconsistent in research). It may suppress the immune system - you need to avoid live vaccines and it may cause immune related problems like mouth ulcers and thrush. It can also compromise your intestinal endothelium, causing constipation or other GI symptoms. For men, HU can cause hypogonadism (oligospermia/azoospermia - well known)(recent research indicates lowered testosterone possible - this finding not accepted in clinical practice yet). While not common, there are some very serious side effects related to compromised vascular endothelium (e.g. leg ulcers and gangrene). Now all of that sounds really scary, but many people take HU and do not encounter these side effects. You have to weigh the risk of thrombosis and damage to major body organs, including the brain. If your platelets are too high, you may also develop Acquired von Willebrand Disease and be at risk for hemorrhage. Hyperviscosity of the blood will also drive your blood pressure up and hypertension carries all sorts of risks. So back to where we started - it all depends on how you respond to HU. FYI - I turned out to be HU intolerant. Even on low-doses, I had some toxic effects. Fortunately, those adverse effects have mostly abated since I discontinued as these side effects usually do. Unfortunately, these decisions are not always black and white. Sometimes we just have the make the best judgement we can based on the information we have. Hope all this helps. All the best to you.

falconered53 profile image
falconered53 in reply tohunter5582

Thank you so much, Hunter. That is a lot of info very succinctly stated. I will study it as I continue to make a decision.

Kelly2 profile image
Kelly2 in reply tohunter5582

What medicines are you currently taking?

falconered53 profile image
falconered53 in reply toKelly2

Hi. I’m taking 500 mg hydroxyurea and 81 mg enteric coated aspirin daily.

hunter5582 profile image
hunter5582 in reply toKelly2

I currently an on a phlebotomy-only protocol for PV (age 65). My form of PV has been relatively indolent. Despite 30+ years of MPN, I have never had a single episode of thrombosis. I did have somewhat excessive hemorrhage when on aspirin. The MPN specialist I saw took me off aspirin as he concurs with the American Heart Association that people age 60+ are at greater risk of hemorrhage and should not take it unless symptomatic for thrombosis.

This may change in the near future. We are considering PEGylated Interferon due to some recent indication that the PV may be advancing. I have had a few incidents of ocular migraine and one apparent episode of silent migraine that triggered palinopsia. Because of my hx resection of brain tumor, I am at risk for continued palinopsia episodes. I may have to choose to treat the symptom (with Topamax) or treat the underlying cause (with PEG-IFN). Given the emrging bady of research indicating benefit to earlier intervention with PEG-IFN, I am leaning that way. Time will tell.

I do take s lovely pile of other meds and supplements, but the most relevant would be: Curcumin, SPM Active, L-Glutathione - inflammation, Belsomra - insomnia, Nexium - GERD, and Losartan - very low dose for hx of hypertension.

All the best th you.

jamieisabella profile image
jamieisabella

Hi there, I was diagnosed at 65, now 74. I had no symptoms and was diagnosed through routine blood tests.i was on aspirin for 5years and tried to avoid hydroxy until I was due to have knee surgery at age 70 and my platelets needed to come down. Like you I was very wary of chemo but neither did I fancy being open to a stroke etc. I have been on them for 4years now and my platelets have been relatively stable in that time. I have a brilliant haematologist who I trust completely. I know many people have had various side effects but aside from feeling overtired every now and again it’s been fine.

kp27kathleen profile image
kp27kathleen

I have been on HU for 5 yrs. Platelets normal now. I am dealing now with skin cancers at least one a month. Dermotologist sp? says HU is the cause. I am 84 and in excellent health with clean arteries. This is really a tough decision at my age. I will have to make an appointment with hemo for help. I hate being chopped on every month. Highest platelets were 750.

Mirror368 profile image
Mirror368 in reply tokp27kathleen

Have you been on high doses of HU? Thanks, Eileen

kp27kathleen profile image
kp27kathleen in reply toMirror368

I've always been on lowest dose and still am.

Mirror368 profile image
Mirror368 in reply tokp27kathleen

I am 78 and been taking 500 mg HU daily since June 2022, and then put on every other day. I am still having daily headaches, Hematologist just told me I could stop HU for a month because labs were all good….platelets 528. I am going to ask about low dose Pegasys when I see her again.

Hope you get this resolved. Eileen

Wyebird profile image
Wyebird

I know I’d far rather have shingles than a stroke. Having suffered one at the age of 50, I am well aware of the the consequences. Besides it impacts on travel insurance lol.

Instow1 profile image
Instow1

dear falconered. I have been on Hydroxycarbamide for 3 years was not given any choice’s. I have been fine on it I think. Some small problems may just be age (74 ) now. They want to check me for hemochromatosis. Hoping I haven’t got that. Maybe the pills but I think it’s better than risk a stroke.

Best wishes. Instow1

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Starting Hydroxyurea

As my platlets currently 908 have been slowly rising have been told I should start on Hydroxyurea....
Jasbak22 profile image

Phlebotomy or Hydroxyurea

I have PV Jak2 positive. My blood counts have been very stable since 2012 so I have not been on...
Sklines profile image

To take Hydrea or not

I have recently been diagnosed with PRV and have had 1 venesection in the past 4 months. I met my...
Splb3317 profile image

Hydroxyurea

Hi my name is Diane and I am 69 years old. I was diagnosed with PV jak 2 positive in January. My...
dladydi profile image

Meds or not meds.

I was diagnosed 2009 (or thereabouts) with JAK2 mutation discovered after BMB because of enlarged...
Franju profile image

Moderation team

Debinha profile image
DebinhaAdministrator
Mazcd profile image
MazcdPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.